From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "J Chapman" Subject: RE: single process pppd for all PPP sessions? [Was [IPCOMP] Use per-cpu buffers] Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 12:18:39 +0100 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <200409131119.i8DBJSgn007059@oss.sgi.com> References: <20040910111047.GA29330@gondor.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: , , , , Return-path: To: "'Herbert Xu'" , "'David S. Miller'" In-Reply-To: <20040910111047.GA29330@gondor.apana.org.au> Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Re: anyone think of doing a single process PPP daemon managing all PPP sessions? Yes, although nothing started yet. Still working on OpenL2TP... http://openl2tp.sf.net/ -James > -----Original Message----- > From: Herbert Xu [mailto:herbert@gondor.apana.org.au] > Sent: 10 September 2004 12:11 > To: David S. Miller > Cc: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru; jmorris@redhat.com; netdev@oss.sgi.com; linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org; paulus@samba.org > Subject: Re: [IPCOMP] Use per-cpu buffers > [snip] > On a totally orthogonal topic, has any body thought of doing a PPP > daemon like the IPsec daemons? That is, have one process that manages > all PPP sessions. This could be useful for large L2TP servers and > alike. >