From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: [PATCH 2.6 NET] Fix ifmap alignment issues over rtnetlink
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 00:41:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040921224127.GM566@postel.suug.ch> (raw)
Introduces a fixed size variant for ifmap for rtnetlink. Fixes
issues with address size mismatch between kernel and userspace.
I couldn't find a better solution than using 64bit for memory
addresses and cast them in the kernel. Obviously this will fail
if userspace provides an address greater than 32bit.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
Is it actually worth to keep trying to do this or should we just
declare that it's only possible via ethtool? Providing the
settings over rtnetlink is definitely a good thing in my eyes.
--- linux-2.6.9-rc2-bk7.orig/include/linux/rtnetlink.h 2004-09-21 23:26:54.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.9-rc2-bk7/include/linux/rtnetlink.h 2004-09-21 23:52:06.000000000 +0200
@@ -577,6 +577,17 @@
__u32 tx_compressed;
};
+/* The struct should be in sync with struct ifmap */
+struct rtnl_link_ifmap
+{
+ __u64 mem_start;
+ __u64 mem_end;
+ __u64 base_addr;
+ __u16 irq;
+ __u8 dma;
+ __u8 port;
+};
+
enum
{
IFLA_UNSPEC,
--- linux-2.6.9-rc2-bk7.orig/net/core/rtnetlink.c 2004-09-21 23:27:28.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.9-rc2-bk7/net/core/rtnetlink.c 2004-09-22 00:27:29.000000000 +0200
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@
}
if (1) {
- struct ifmap map = {
+ struct rtnl_link_ifmap map = {
.mem_start = dev->mem_start,
.mem_end = dev->mem_end,
.base_addr = dev->base_addr,
@@ -277,6 +277,9 @@
dev_change_flags(dev, ifm->ifi_flags);
if (ida[IFLA_MAP - 1]) {
+ struct rtnl_link_ifmap *u_map;
+ struct ifmap k_map;
+
if (!dev->set_config) {
err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
goto out;
@@ -287,11 +290,19 @@
goto out;
}
- if (ida[IFLA_MAP - 1]->rta_len != RTA_LENGTH(sizeof(struct ifmap)))
+ if (ida[IFLA_MAP - 1]->rta_len != RTA_LENGTH(sizeof(*u_map)))
goto out;
-
- err = dev->set_config(dev, (struct ifmap *)
- RTA_DATA(ida[IFLA_MAP - 1]));
+
+ u_map = RTA_DATA(ida[IFLA_MAP - 1]);
+
+ k_map.mem_start = (unsigned long) u_map->mem_start;
+ k_map.mem_end = (unsigned long) u_map->mem_end;
+ k_map.base_addr = (unsigned short) u_map->base_addr;
+ k_map.irq = (unsigned char) u_map->irq;
+ k_map.dma = (unsigned char) u_map->dma;
+ k_map.port = (unsigned char) u_map->port;
+
+ err = dev->set_config(dev, (struct ifmap *) &k_map);
if (err)
goto out;
next reply other threads:[~2004-09-21 22:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-21 22:41 Thomas Graf [this message]
2004-09-21 23:57 ` [PATCH 2.6 NET] Fix ifmap alignment issues over rtnetlink David S. Miller
2004-09-22 0:03 ` Thomas Graf
2004-09-22 0:21 ` David S. Miller
2004-09-22 2:18 ` Herbert Xu
2004-09-22 2:36 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040921224127.GM566@postel.suug.ch \
--to=tgraf@suug.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).