From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nishanth Aravamudan Subject: Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [drivers] use msleep() instead of schedule_timeout() (from Nishanth Aravamudan ) Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 09:07:10 -0700 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <20040923160710.GB1699@us.ibm.com> References: <200409212029.i8LKTINv010576@ginger.cmf.nrl.navy.mil> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com, davem@redhat.com, kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org Return-path: To: chas3@users.sourceforge.net Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200409212029.i8LKTINv010576@ginger.cmf.nrl.navy.mil> Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 04:29:19PM -0400, chas williams (contractor) wrote: > diff -Nru a/drivers/atm/lanai.c b/drivers/atm/lanai.c > --- a/drivers/atm/lanai.c 2004-09-21 12:48:17 -04:00 > +++ b/drivers/atm/lanai.c 2004-09-21 12:48:17 -04:00 > @@ -813,7 +813,7 @@ > DPRINTK("read, write = %d, %d\n", read, write); > break; > } > - schedule_timeout(HZ / 25); > + msleep(4); Somehow this got changed for msleep(40); to msleep(4); !! :) The patch I sent on 15 September had msleep(40); in it, at least. If you could make the change in your bk, that would be great! -Nish