From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: On DaveMs congestion control algorithm WAS(Re: [PATCH] Improve behaviour of Netlink Sockets Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 11:24:32 -0700 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <20040928112432.238f433c.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1096289189.1075.37.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20040927213607.GD7243@gondor.apana.org.au> <1096339407.8660.33.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20040928024614.GA9911@gondor.apana.org.au> <1096340772.8659.51.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20040928032321.GB10116@gondor.apana.org.au> <1096343125.8661.96.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20040928035921.GA10675@gondor.apana.org.au> <1096367787.8662.146.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20040928111159.GA18421@gondor.apana.org.au> <20040928121647.GA21121@gondor.apana.org.au> <1096375188.8663.226.camel@jzny.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, pablo@eurodev.net, netdev@oss.sgi.com Return-path: To: hadi@cyberus.ca In-Reply-To: <1096375188.8663.226.camel@jzny.localdomain> Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 28 Sep 2004 08:39:49 -0400 jamal wrote: > On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 08:16, Herbert Xu wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 09:11:59PM +1000, herbert wrote: > > > > > > > BTW, Davem gets away with this congestion control alg all the time. > > > > Heck i think his sanity survives because of it - I bet you hes got this > > > > thread under congestion controlled right now;-> > > > > > > Yep, his overrun flag sure is set :) > > > > Now if he puts his mailing admin hat on and tells us to shut up, that > > would be congestion control :) > > Hed have to go and read all the emails first ;-> i.e the overrun flag > requires that you reread state. When I see two guys going at it like you too, I just wait for the dust to settle in the form of a patch and then I reread the thread as if it were the latest drama show on TV :-)