From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: bad TSO performance in 2.6.9-rc2-BK Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:38:30 -0700 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <20040928133830.1eba4476.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20040923161141.4ea9be4c.davem@davemloft.net> <20040927160411.22b44f48.davem@davemloft.net> <20040927233639.GA8333@gondor.apana.org.au> <20040927171356.6a59d039.davem@davemloft.net> <415910D2.7010808@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, jheffner@psc.edu, ak@suse.de, andy.grover@gmail.com, anton@samba.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com Return-path: To: Nivedita Singhvi In-Reply-To: <415910D2.7010808@us.ibm.com> Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 00:20:50 -0700 Nivedita Singhvi wrote: > David S. Miller wrote: > > > Bright minds think alike. :-) We have to keep all the other > > packet counts in sync as well. > > > > Andi, others, forget my previous hack patch to tcp_clean_rtx_queue() > > and give this more complete patch a try. > > > > I'm getting really good results here on my tg3<-->tg3 setup using > > this patch. > > Dave, were you seeing a significant number of retransmissions > and sacks in your tests? None. I am working on a local network through a gigabit switch. I will work on making sure cases involving loss work correctly, via the netem module, before I submit these fixes upstream to Linus. Likely I will complete this work today.