From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: RFC/PATCH capture qdisc requeue event in stats
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 16:18:38 -0700
Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Message-ID: <20040928161838.3d19a17d.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <1093799632.1073.410.camel@jzny.localdomain>
	<1096413009.27967.1.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: hadi@cyberus.ca, davem@redhat.com, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Return-path: <netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>
In-Reply-To: <1096413009.27967.1.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 16:10:09 -0700
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org> wrote:

> On Sun, 2004-08-29 at 13:13 -0400, jamal wrote:
> > 
> > The requeue event is useful in finding out when a device is overloaded
> > on the egress (bus or bandwidth).
> > Atached patch introduces this. I would have used the overlimit bits
> > but at the moment thats being used for different semantical reasons.
> > I have not done extensive testing on it. 
> > 
> > Opinions welcome - If all is good, Dave please apply.
> 
> Dave, what happened to this?  I put the stuff into iproute2 but the
> requeue stat never made it into 2.6.  Is it a bad idea?

Yes, API breaker.