From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: ak@suse.de, netdev@oss.sgi.com, jheffner@psc.edu,
herbert@gondor.apana.org.au
Subject: Re: Current 2.6.x TSO state
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 12:56:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041001125643.30c6830f.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041001195146.GA23046@wotan.suse.de>
On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 21:51:47 +0200
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> wrote:
> > > max win adv: 5840 bytes max win adv: 63712 bytes
> > > min win adv: 5840 bytes min win adv: 5792 bytes
> >
> > That stinks that the receiver is only using a 64K window,
> > that's way too small for gigabit.
>
> Just using the default, no tuning.
>
> I have some patches in the pipeline to do automatic window tuning
> based on link speed based on dev->features. But they were actually more
> intended for 10Gbit/s (where all the defaults are completely inadequate)
> And it needs a bit more work.
As mentioned, the TCP receive buffer auto-tuning takes care
of all of this in 2.6.6 and later. It's just 2.6.5 doesn't
have John Heffner's auto-tuning code which is why your test
case is so stuck in the mud.
Also, the stretch ACK's are quite normal. If the receiver can't
advertize a larger window, we won't spit out an ACK until
the ack timeout.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-01 19:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-01 4:32 Current 2.6.x TSO state David S. Miller
2004-10-01 10:11 ` Andi Kleen
2004-10-01 19:47 ` David S. Miller
2004-10-01 19:51 ` Andi Kleen
2004-10-01 19:56 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2004-10-01 20:01 ` Andi Kleen
2004-10-01 20:15 ` David S. Miller
2004-10-01 20:33 ` John Heffner
2004-10-01 23:19 ` Andi Kleen
2004-10-02 0:04 ` David S. Miller
2004-10-01 13:06 ` Herbert Xu
2004-10-03 21:50 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041001125643.30c6830f.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=jheffner@psc.edu \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).