From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [Kernel-janitors] Re: [PATCH 2.6.9-rc2 17/38] net/islpci_dev: replace schedule_timeout() with msleep() Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 09:55:23 -0700 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <20041001165523.GC11646@kroah.com> References: <5.1.0.14.2.20040924074745.00b1cd40@pop.t-online.de> <20040923221303.GB13244@us.ibm.com> <20040923221303.GB13244@us.ibm.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20040924074745.00b1cd40@pop.t-online.de> <5.1.0.14.2.20041001084419.02570b18@pop.t-online.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jeff Garzik , netdev@oss.sgi.com, kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org, mcgrof@studorgs.rutgers.edu, prism54-devel@prism54.org, hvr@gnu.org Return-path: To: Margit Schubert-While Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20041001084419.02570b18@pop.t-online.de> Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 09:04:27AM +0200, Margit Schubert-While wrote: > At 00:15 01.10.2004 -0400, Jeff scribeth: > >I would rather see an msleep implementation in 2.4.x... > > Hear, hear. > And can we PLEASE have a > "#define HAVE_MSLEEP" in delay.h ?!!! > (2.4. AND 2.6) No, this is not how the kernel source tree works, sorry. greg k-h