* cls patchlet
@ 2004-10-03 19:52 jamal
2004-10-03 20:12 ` Resend WAS(Re: " jamal
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: jamal @ 2004-10-03 19:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David S. Miller; +Cc: netdev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 76 bytes --]
Dave,
resets class when tc_classid non-zero.
Please apply.
cheers,
jamal
[-- Attachment #2: classfix_p --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 921 bytes --]
--- a/net/sched/cls_u32.c 2004-08-14 01:36:33.000000000 -0400
+++ b/net/sched/cls_u32.c 2004-10-01 08:29:48.000000000 -0400
@@ -178,6 +178,7 @@
int pol_res = tcf_action_exec(skb, n->action);
if (skb->tc_classid > 0) {
res->classid = skb->tc_classid;
+ res->class = 0;
skb->tc_classid = 0;
}
--- /usr/src/269-rc3-mod/net/sched/cls_fw.c 2004/10/01 12:36:06 1.1
+++ /usr/src/269-rc3-mod/net/sched/cls_fw.c 2004/10/01 14:22:30
@@ -103,6 +103,12 @@
#endif
if (f->action) {
int pol_res = tcf_action_exec(skb, f->action);
+ if (skb->tc_classid > 0) {
+ res->classid = skb->tc_classid;
+ res->class = 0;
+ skb->tc_classid = 0;
+ }
+
if (pol_res >= 0)
return pol_res;
} else
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Resend WAS(Re: cls patchlet
2004-10-03 19:52 cls patchlet jamal
@ 2004-10-03 20:12 ` jamal
2004-10-03 22:12 ` David S. Miller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: jamal @ 2004-10-03 20:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David S. Miller; +Cc: netdev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 180 bytes --]
Ignore previous. This is better formated ;->
On Sun, 2004-10-03 at 15:52, jamal wrote:
> Dave,
>
> resets class when tc_classid non-zero.
>
> Please apply.
>
> cheers,
> jamal
[-- Attachment #2: classfix_p --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 883 bytes --]
--- a/net/sched/cls_u32.c 2004-08-14 01:36:33.000000000 -0400
+++ b/net/sched/cls_u32.c 2004-10-01 08:29:48.000000000 -0400
@@ -178,6 +178,7 @@
int pol_res = tcf_action_exec(skb, n->action);
if (skb->tc_classid > 0) {
res->classid = skb->tc_classid;
+ res->class = 0;
skb->tc_classid = 0;
}
--- a/net/sched/cls_fw.c 2004/10/01 12:36:06 1.1
+++ b/net/sched/cls_fw.c 2004/10/01 14:22:30
@@ -103,6 +103,12 @@
#endif
if (f->action) {
int pol_res = tcf_action_exec(skb, f->action);
+ if (skb->tc_classid > 0) {
+ res->classid = skb->tc_classid;
+ res->class = 0;
+ skb->tc_classid = 0;
+ }
+
if (pol_res >= 0)
return pol_res;
} else
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Resend WAS(Re: cls patchlet
2004-10-03 20:12 ` Resend WAS(Re: " jamal
@ 2004-10-03 22:12 ` David S. Miller
2004-10-03 22:22 ` jamal
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: David S. Miller @ 2004-10-03 22:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: hadi; +Cc: netdev
On 03 Oct 2004 16:12:32 -0400
jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca> wrote:
> Ignore previous. This is better formated ;->
Any particular reason not to remove this work into the
common code in tcf_action_exec()? Like so:
===== include/net/pkt_sched.h 1.23 vs edited =====
--- 1.23/include/net/pkt_sched.h 2004-09-28 13:58:51 -07:00
+++ edited/include/net/pkt_sched.h 2004-10-03 14:50:35 -07:00
@@ -376,7 +376,7 @@ struct tc_action_ops
extern int tcf_register_action(struct tc_action_ops *a);
extern int tcf_unregister_action(struct tc_action_ops *a);
extern void tcf_action_destroy(struct tc_action *a, int bind);
-extern int tcf_action_exec(struct sk_buff *skb, struct tc_action *a);
+extern int tcf_action_exec(struct sk_buff *skb, struct tc_action *a, struct tcf_result *res);
extern int tcf_action_init(struct rtattr *rta, struct rtattr *est, struct tc_action *a,char *n, int ovr, int bind);
extern int tcf_action_init_1(struct rtattr *rta, struct rtattr *est, struct tc_action *a,char *n, int ovr, int bind);
extern int tcf_action_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, struct tc_action *a, int, int);
===== net/sched/act_api.c 1.4 vs edited =====
--- 1.4/net/sched/act_api.c 2004-06-29 14:20:44 -07:00
+++ edited/net/sched/act_api.c 2004-10-03 14:51:41 -07:00
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ struct tc_action_ops *tc_lookup_action_i
return a;
}
-int tcf_action_exec(struct sk_buff *skb,struct tc_action *act)
+int tcf_action_exec(struct sk_buff *skb,struct tc_action *act, struct tcf_result *res)
{
struct tc_action *a;
@@ -164,7 +164,8 @@ int tcf_action_exec(struct sk_buff *skb,
if (skb->tc_verd & TC_NCLS) {
skb->tc_verd = CLR_TC_NCLS(skb->tc_verd);
D2PRINTK("(%p)tcf_action_exec: cleared TC_NCLS in %s out %s\n",skb,skb->input_dev?skb->input_dev->name:"xxx",skb->dev->name);
- return TC_ACT_OK;
+ ret = TC_ACT_OK;
+ goto exec_done;
}
while ((a = act) != NULL) {
repeat:
@@ -186,6 +187,11 @@ repeat:
}
exec_done:
+ if (skb->tc_classid > 0) {
+ res->classid = skb->tc_classid;
+ res->class = 0;
+ skb->tc_classid = 0;
+ }
return ret;
}
===== net/sched/cls_fw.c 1.8 vs edited =====
--- 1.8/net/sched/cls_fw.c 2004-07-06 14:26:23 -07:00
+++ edited/net/sched/cls_fw.c 2004-10-03 14:52:05 -07:00
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static int fw_classify(struct sk_buff *s
}
#endif
if (f->action) {
- int pol_res = tcf_action_exec(skb, f->action);
+ int pol_res = tcf_action_exec(skb, f->action, res);
if (pol_res >= 0)
return pol_res;
} else
===== net/sched/cls_u32.c 1.16 vs edited =====
--- 1.16/net/sched/cls_u32.c 2004-07-29 15:44:49 -07:00
+++ edited/net/sched/cls_u32.c 2004-10-03 14:52:00 -07:00
@@ -175,12 +175,7 @@ check_terminal:
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
if (n->action) {
- int pol_res = tcf_action_exec(skb, n->action);
- if (skb->tc_classid > 0) {
- res->classid = skb->tc_classid;
- skb->tc_classid = 0;
- }
-
+ int pol_res = tcf_action_exec(skb, n->action, res);
if (pol_res >= 0)
return pol_res;
} else
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Resend WAS(Re: cls patchlet
2004-10-03 22:12 ` David S. Miller
@ 2004-10-03 22:22 ` jamal
2004-10-03 22:22 ` David S. Miller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: jamal @ 2004-10-03 22:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David S. Miller; +Cc: netdev
On Sun, 2004-10-03 at 18:12, David S. Miller wrote:
> On 03 Oct 2004 16:12:32 -0400
> jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca> wrote:
>
> > Ignore previous. This is better formated ;->
>
> Any particular reason not to remove this work into the
> common code in tcf_action_exec()? Like so:
Looks good ;-> Go ahead and push that instead and i will run my
regression tests on your changes.
cheers,
jamal
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Resend WAS(Re: cls patchlet
2004-10-03 22:22 ` jamal
@ 2004-10-03 22:22 ` David S. Miller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: David S. Miller @ 2004-10-03 22:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: hadi; +Cc: netdev
On 03 Oct 2004 18:22:37 -0400
jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2004-10-03 at 18:12, David S. Miller wrote:
> > On 03 Oct 2004 16:12:32 -0400
> > jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca> wrote:
> >
> > > Ignore previous. This is better formated ;->
> >
> > Any particular reason not to remove this work into the
> > common code in tcf_action_exec()? Like so:
>
> Looks good ;-> Go ahead and push that instead and i will run my
> regression tests on your changes.
Great, thanks for the quick feedback.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-10-03 22:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-10-03 19:52 cls patchlet jamal
2004-10-03 20:12 ` Resend WAS(Re: " jamal
2004-10-03 22:12 ` David S. Miller
2004-10-03 22:22 ` jamal
2004-10-03 22:22 ` David S. Miller
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).