From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: jgarzik@pobox.com, acme@conectiva.com.br, corey@world.std.com,
netdev@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Raylink/WebGear testing - ray_cs.c iomem bug?
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 11:14:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041006111431.442ff47e.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0410061102590.8290@ppc970.osdl.org>
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004 11:06:45 -0700 (PDT)
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> wrote:
> > NUMBER_OF_CCS is 64, and the difference between CCS_BASE and RCS_BASE
> > is 0x400 so this really doesn't account for anything.
>
> It does, though: as I noted in my second mail (after trying to figure it
> out some more) the size of both ccs and rcs is 16 bytes, so when you
> offset by 64, so the difference between RCS_BASE and CCS_BASE ends up
> being exactly "NUMBER_OF_CCS*sizeof(struct ccs/rcs)", which explains how
> the base is the same, and the _index_ ends up being the one that selects
> between the two.
Right, that makes perfect sense. I missed how it was doing structure
pointer arithmetic when offsetting by the index.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-06 18:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-06 17:43 Raylink/WebGear testing - ray_cs.c iomem bug? Linus Torvalds
2004-10-06 17:54 ` David S. Miller
2004-10-06 18:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-10-06 18:14 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2004-10-06 17:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-10-06 19:16 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-10-06 21:59 ` Thomas Davis
2004-10-07 5:46 ` Thomas Davis
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-10-08 22:08 Jean Tourrilhes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041006111431.442ff47e.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=acme@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=corey@world.std.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).