From: Colin Leroy <colin@colino.net>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: mpm@selenic.com, akpm@osdl.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Prevent netpoll hanging when link is down
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 16:05:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041007160532.60c3f26b@pirandello> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041006234912.66bfbdcc.davem@davemloft.net>
On 06 Oct 2004 at 23h10, David S. Miller wrote:
Hi again,
> Folks debugging this should verify that gp->hw_running is non-zero
> when the problematic case runs.
I looked a bit more at the code and found out a possible problem.
However it doesn't fix the hang, so either it's not what I found, or
there's something else.
First, my newbie question: is it possible to deadlock a spinlock on a
Uniprocessor kernel ? For example, there's something I find suspect in
netpoll/sungem interaction:
it starts in netpoll_send_skb(), where xmit_lock is acquired; then,
gem_start_xmit() is called. In gem_start_xmit(), if the TX ring is full,
we return 1, but previously log the error via printk().
In this condition, isn't netpoll_send_skb() called again (via the whole
console stuff), where it retries to get the lock on xmit_lock? Could
that cause a deadlock?
Also, at the end of netpoll_send_skb() is a check for the return status
of hard_start_xmit. If I understand correctly, hard_start_xmit functions
return 0 for success, -1 for "busy please retry" and 1 for "hard error".
Shouldn't netpoll free the skb and forget about it in case status is 1
(instead of goto'ing repeat) ?
Based on this, I've a new patch that I'm attaching. As said it doesn't
fix the problem, but if my I understood is valid, it may still be
useful ?
Any insight will be greatly appreciated :)
Patch following:
--- a/net/core/netpoll.c 2004-10-05 21:09:49.000000000 +0200
+++ b/net/core/netpoll.c 2004-10-07 14:11:00.000000000 +0200
@@ -188,7 +188,10 @@
return;
}
- spin_lock(&np->dev->xmit_lock);
+ if (!spin_trylock(&np->dev->xmit_lock)) {
+ /* looks like np->dev->hard_start_xmit did a printk */
+ goto bail_free;
+ }
np->dev->xmit_lock_owner = smp_processor_id();
/*
@@ -204,13 +207,18 @@
}
status = np->dev->hard_start_xmit(skb, np->dev);
+
np->dev->xmit_lock_owner = -1;
spin_unlock(&np->dev->xmit_lock);
- /* transmit busy */
- if(status) {
+ if(status == -1) {
+ /* transmit busy */
netpoll_poll(np);
goto repeat;
+ } else if (status == 1) {
+ /* hard error, drop this skb */
+bail_free:
+ __kfree_skb(skb);
}
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-07 14:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20041006232544.53615761@jack.colino.net>
2004-10-06 21:43 ` [PATCH] Prevent netpoll hanging when link is down Matt Mackall
2004-10-07 5:53 ` Colin Leroy
2004-10-07 6:49 ` David S. Miller
2004-10-07 8:33 ` Colin Leroy
2004-10-07 8:45 ` Colin Leroy
2004-10-07 14:05 ` Colin Leroy [this message]
2004-10-07 18:28 ` David S. Miller
2004-10-07 18:41 ` Matt Mackall
2004-10-07 20:00 ` Colin Leroy
2004-10-07 18:43 ` Andi Kleen
2004-10-07 20:44 ` Colin Leroy
2004-10-07 21:45 ` Andi Kleen
2004-10-07 21:50 ` Matt Mackall
2004-10-07 22:07 ` David S. Miller
2004-10-07 23:43 ` Matt Mackall
2004-10-07 23:50 ` Andi Kleen
2004-10-08 6:46 ` Colin Leroy
2004-10-08 21:53 ` Matt Mackall
2004-10-08 7:06 ` Colin Leroy
2004-10-08 22:00 ` Matt Mackall
2004-10-08 22:18 ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-11 3:59 ` David S. Miller
2004-10-11 15:40 ` Andi Kleen
2004-10-11 16:22 ` Matt Mackall
2004-10-11 16:32 ` Andi Kleen
2004-10-11 16:36 ` Matt Mackall
2004-10-11 16:43 ` Andi Kleen
2004-10-11 16:58 ` Matt Mackall
2004-10-11 17:41 ` Andi Kleen
2004-10-11 20:45 ` Colin Leroy
[not found] ` <5cac192f0410181443303379e2@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <5cac192f041018145824acce5a@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20041020161119.6e30efe5@pirandello>
[not found] ` <5cac192f0410200848179ccc81@mail.gmail.com>
2004-10-21 16:36 ` Colin Leroy
2004-10-24 15:22 ` Eric Lemoine
2004-10-07 22:08 ` David S. Miller
2004-10-08 6:54 ` Colin Leroy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041007160532.60c3f26b@pirandello \
--to=colin@colino.net \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).