netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Colin Leroy <colin@colino.net>, akpm@osdl.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Prevent netpoll hanging when link is down
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 13:41:41 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041007184141.GL31237@waste.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041007112846.5c85b2d9.davem@davemloft.net>

On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 11:28:46AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 16:05:32 +0200
> Colin Leroy <colin@colino.net> wrote:
> 
> > First, my newbie question: is it possible to deadlock a spinlock on a
> > Uniprocessor kernel ? For example, there's something I find suspect in
> > netpoll/sungem interaction:
> > 
> 
> Oh yes, it appears that netpoll doesn't support NETIF_F_LLTX locking,
> crap :(
> 
> When a device has NETIF_F_LLTX set, it means that the driver's
> dev->hard_start_xmit() routine is what takes the xmit_lock, not
> the caller one level up.
> 
> Andi Kleen didn't fix up netpoll when he did his LLTX changes, oops.
> 
> So, netpoll needs to have the NETIF_F_LLTX stuff added to it.
> Basically:
> 
> 1) If NETIF_F_LLTX is clear, same as before
> 2) If NETIF_F_LLTX is set:
> 	a) Do not take xmit_lock
> 	b) Check ->hard_start_xmit() return value,
> 	   if it is NETDEV_TX_LOCKED, then
> 	   spin_trylock(&dev->xmit_lock) failed
>            in ->hard_start_xmit()

Colin, feeling adventurous enough to take a stab at this? It looks
pretty straightforward but I'm going to be even more useless than
usual for the next two weeks.

> 
> The best example is in net/sched/sch_generic.c:qdisc_restart()
> 
> 		unsigned nolock = (dev->features & NETIF_F_LLTX);
> 		/*
> 		 * When the driver has LLTX set it does its own locking
> 		 * in start_xmit. No need to add additional overhead by
> 		 * locking again. These checks are worth it because
> 		 * even uncongested locks can be quite expensive.
> 		 * The driver can do trylock like here too, in case
> 		 * of lock congestion it should return -1 and the packet
> 		 * will be requeued.
> 		 */
> 		if (!nolock) {
> 			if (!spin_trylock(&dev->xmit_lock)) {
> 			collision:
> 				/* So, someone grabbed the driver. */
> 				
> 				/* It may be transient configuration error,
> 				   when hard_start_xmit() recurses. We detect
> 				   it by checking xmit owner and drop the
> 				   packet when deadloop is detected.
> 				*/
> 				if (dev->xmit_lock_owner == smp_processor_id()) {
> 					kfree_skb(skb);
> 					if (net_ratelimit())
> 						printk(KERN_DEBUG "Dead loop on netdevice %s, fix it urgently!\n", dev->name);
> 					return -1;
> 				}
> 				__get_cpu_var(netdev_rx_stat).cpu_collision++;
> 				goto requeue;
> 			}
> 			/* Remember that the driver is grabbed by us. */
> 			dev->xmit_lock_owner = smp_processor_id();
> 		}
> 		
> 		{
> 			/* And release queue */
> 			spin_unlock(&dev->queue_lock);
> 
> 			if (!netif_queue_stopped(dev)) {
> 				int ret;
> 				if (netdev_nit)
> 					dev_queue_xmit_nit(skb, dev);
> 
> 				ret = dev->hard_start_xmit(skb, dev);
> 				if (ret == NETDEV_TX_OK) { 
> 					if (!nolock) {
> 						dev->xmit_lock_owner = -1;
> 						spin_unlock(&dev->xmit_lock);
> 					}
> 					spin_lock(&dev->queue_lock);
> 					return -1;
> 				}
> 				if (ret == NETDEV_TX_LOCKED && nolock) {
> 					spin_lock(&dev->queue_lock);
> 					goto collision; 
> 				}
> 			}
> 
> 			/* NETDEV_TX_BUSY - we need to requeue */
> 			/* Release the driver */
> 			if (!nolock) { 
> 				dev->xmit_lock_owner = -1;
> 				spin_unlock(&dev->xmit_lock);
> 			} 
> 			spin_lock(&dev->queue_lock);
> 			q = dev->qdisc;
> 		}

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.

  reply	other threads:[~2004-10-07 18:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20041006232544.53615761@jack.colino.net>
2004-10-06 21:43 ` [PATCH] Prevent netpoll hanging when link is down Matt Mackall
2004-10-07  5:53   ` Colin Leroy
2004-10-07  6:49     ` David S. Miller
2004-10-07  8:33       ` Colin Leroy
2004-10-07  8:45         ` Colin Leroy
2004-10-07 14:05       ` Colin Leroy
2004-10-07 18:28         ` David S. Miller
2004-10-07 18:41           ` Matt Mackall [this message]
2004-10-07 20:00             ` Colin Leroy
2004-10-07 18:43           ` Andi Kleen
2004-10-07 20:44           ` Colin Leroy
2004-10-07 21:45             ` Andi Kleen
2004-10-07 21:50               ` Matt Mackall
2004-10-07 22:07                 ` David S. Miller
2004-10-07 23:43                   ` Matt Mackall
2004-10-07 23:50                     ` Andi Kleen
2004-10-08  6:46                       ` Colin Leroy
2004-10-08 21:53                         ` Matt Mackall
2004-10-08  7:06               ` Colin Leroy
2004-10-08 22:00                 ` Matt Mackall
2004-10-08 22:18                   ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-11  3:59                     ` David S. Miller
2004-10-11 15:40                       ` Andi Kleen
2004-10-11 16:22                         ` Matt Mackall
2004-10-11 16:32                           ` Andi Kleen
2004-10-11 16:36                             ` Matt Mackall
2004-10-11 16:43                               ` Andi Kleen
2004-10-11 16:58                                 ` Matt Mackall
2004-10-11 17:41                                   ` Andi Kleen
2004-10-11 20:45                                   ` Colin Leroy
     [not found]                                     ` <5cac192f0410181443303379e2@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]                                       ` <5cac192f041018145824acce5a@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]                                         ` <20041020161119.6e30efe5@pirandello>
     [not found]                                           ` <5cac192f0410200848179ccc81@mail.gmail.com>
2004-10-21 16:36                                             ` Colin Leroy
2004-10-24 15:22                                               ` Eric Lemoine
2004-10-07 22:08             ` David S. Miller
2004-10-08  6:54               ` Colin Leroy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20041007184141.GL31237@waste.org \
    --to=mpm@selenic.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=colin@colino.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).