From: bert hubert <ahu@ds9a.nl>
To: Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>
Cc: Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb@suse.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6] iptables CLUSTERIP target
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 17:08:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041021150856.GA27191@outpost.ds9a.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041021142527.GG3551@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org>
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 04:25:27PM +0200, Harald Welte wrote:
> I'm not a big fan of inventing new kernel/userspace interfaces. We
> don't have any associated device, so we don't have any ioctl()s or stuff
> like that.
Or use netlink.
> So instead of introducing a new syscall, I think /proc is just the right
> way to deal with this :)
Or even more modern, clusteripfs.
> Let me give it some testing, I'll re-submit it later today or tomorrow.
I'll test it at home to see if it does the right thing too.
> > > > And yes, I've received hate mail over this from switch engineers :-)
The hate mail originated from a large telco, I think the innovation just
offended their sensitive minds.
Bert
--
http://www.PowerDNS.com Open source, database driven DNS Software
http://lartc.org Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control HOWTO
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-21 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-20 22:38 [PATCH 2.6] iptables CLUSTERIP target Harald Welte
2004-10-20 23:18 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2004-10-21 4:40 ` David S. Miller
2004-10-21 7:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-21 7:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-21 9:12 ` Harald Welte
2004-10-21 9:40 ` Herbert Xu
2004-10-21 11:05 ` bert hubert
2004-10-21 13:03 ` Harald Welte
2004-10-21 13:33 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-10-21 14:25 ` Harald Welte
2004-10-21 15:08 ` bert hubert [this message]
2004-10-21 21:31 ` Allowing netlink_family to be any integer (was: [PATCH 2.6] iptables CLUSTERIP target) Herbert Xu
2004-10-21 22:53 ` Thomas Graf
2004-10-21 23:02 ` Allowing netlink_family to be any integer Ben Greear
2004-10-22 12:25 ` Allowing netlink_family to be any integer (was: [PATCH 2.6] iptables CLUSTERIP target) Herbert Xu
2004-10-22 12:53 ` jamal
2004-10-22 11:29 ` jamal
2004-10-22 11:39 ` Herbert Xu
2004-10-22 12:19 ` jamal
2004-10-22 12:32 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2004-10-22 23:05 ` David S. Miller
2004-10-22 23:16 ` Herbert Xu
2004-10-26 3:27 ` David S. Miller
2004-10-21 16:36 ` [PATCH 2.6] iptables CLUSTERIP target, seq_file version Harald Welte
2004-10-21 17:44 ` jamal
2004-10-21 18:03 ` Harald Welte
2004-10-21 18:41 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2004-10-22 5:52 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041021150856.GA27191@outpost.ds9a.nl \
--to=ahu@ds9a.nl \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=laforge@netfilter.org \
--cc=lmb@suse.de \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).