From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6] iptables CLUSTERIP target, seq_file version Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 22:52:08 -0700 Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <20041021225208.44ddaa10.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20041020223828.GP19899@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> <20041021163655.GK3551@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com, netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org, lmb@suse.de Return-path: To: Harald Welte In-Reply-To: <20041021163655.GK3551@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 18:36:55 +0200 Harald Welte wrote: > This is the 'CLUSTERIP' target for iptables, this time no core kernel > changes required, please apply. > > This enables you to build a static load sharing cluster between multiple > nodes - without the requirement to have a load balancer. It uses a > series of [evil] tricks like replying with linklayer multicast addresses > to ARP requests, and using CONNMARK for stateful blocking all traffic > not intended for the local node. It's clever and nasty, I like it :-) Thanks for cleaning it up to use seq_file. Patch applied.