netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dan A. Dickey" <dan.dickey@savvis.net>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Sridhar Samudrala <sri@us.ibm.com>, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: TCP Hang (or close to it):  Windows XP -> Linux (w/tcp_bic)
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 13:21:25 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200410291321.25723.dan.dickey@savvis.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041029110019.4f175979.davem@davemloft.net>

On Friday 29 October 2004 13:00, David S. Miller wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 10:10:42 -0700 (PDT)
>
> Sridhar Samudrala <sri@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> > This looks like the same TCP window overflow problem in 2.6.7
> > that came up a couple of days back.
> >
> > See the thread
> >  http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=109887532400001&r=1&w=2
> > and the patch posted by davem.
>
> Yes, and BTW for the original poster, BIC only effects sender
> behavior whereas in your test case the Linux system with BIC
> enabled is the receiver.

That's a good point.  I was concerned that it might be
playing a role in what window size got sent back to
the sending machine.  Glad to hear it's not a worry.
BTW - any idea if tcp_bic would be easily modified
to be configurable on a per interface basis?  We typically
have a 100Mb interface on a LAN; and another 100Mb
interface going out to a WAN (DS3 or E3).
We're using tcp_bic to get near 95+% utilization of the
WAN connection; but I don't think we need it on the LAN,
and in some situations it may interfere... or, is this not
a concern?  Thanks again all.

Sridhar,
thank's for the pointer.

I'll be updating to 2.6.9 and will let you know the
results of my testing.
 -Dan

-- 
Dan A. Dickey
dan.dickey@savvis.net

SAVVIS
Transforming Information Technology

      reply	other threads:[~2004-10-29 18:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-10-29 14:25 TCP Hang (or close to it): Windows XP -> Linux (w/tcp_bic) Dan A. Dickey
2004-10-29 17:10 ` Sridhar Samudrala
2004-10-29 18:00   ` David S. Miller
2004-10-29 18:21     ` Dan A. Dickey [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200410291321.25723.dan.dickey@savvis.net \
    --to=dan.dickey@savvis.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=sri@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).