From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: Asynchronous crypto layer. Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 07:16:53 +0100 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <20041030061653.GA22838@infradead.org> References: <1099030958.4944.148.camel@uganda> <4182A05F.1080505@errno.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru, netdev@oss.sgi.com, cryptoapi@lists.logix.cz Return-path: To: Sam Leffler Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4182A05F.1080505@errno.com> Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 12:56:15PM -0700, Sam Leffler wrote: > I realize this suggestion will be met with the usual boo's and catcalls > but it'd also be nice if all systems could share a common user-level api > so, for example, you could just _use_ the support in openssl that's been > around for several years. Does FreeBSD have a less broken user API than OpenBSD? The OpenBSD API had been implemented for Linux and had been rejected dueto execessive bogusness.