From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eugene Surovegin Subject: Re: Asynchronous crypto layer. Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 13:39:06 -0700 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <20041030203906.GC6256@gate.ebshome.net> References: <1099030958.4944.148.camel@uganda> <1099053738.1024.104.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20041029180652.113f0f6e@zanzibar.2ka.mipt.ru> <41824D9A.3070407@logix.cz> <20041029183606.0b1a0538@zanzibar.2ka.mipt.ru> <20041029192741.5344ad0f@zanzibar.2ka.mipt.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Michal Ludvig , netdev@oss.sgi.com, cryptoapi@lists.logix.cz Return-path: To: Evgeniy Polyakov Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041029192741.5344ad0f@zanzibar.2ka.mipt.ru> Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 07:27:41PM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > but it was designed to be usefull only in custom MX box, This is not true. I coded it using Hifn PCI card plugged in 440GP eval board as well in P4 2.6 GHz box. Driver isn't perfect, it's quite simple, I suspended all work on it because without async crypto it doesn't make a lot of sense. > so it has some design notes that I do not agree with. And they are (I know there are problems, just curious which ones you "don't agree with") ? -- Euege