From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: [PATCH] use local_softirq_pending instead of softirq_pending in netif_rx_ni Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 11:38:46 +0100 Message-ID: <20041114103846.GA32024@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com Return-path: To: davem@redhat.com Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Some architectures can optimize local_softirq_pending much better than softirq_pending(smp_processor_id()), and for all others the former is just a macro expanding to the later. Also this is the last use of softirq_pending() in common code, once this is in we can soon kill the notation of beeing able to query other cpus softirq pending count. --- 1.174/net/core/dev.c 2004-11-10 01:12:00 +01:00 +++ edited/net/core/dev.c 2004-11-14 11:35:19 +01:00 @@ -1470,7 +1470,7 @@ int netif_rx_ni(struct sk_buff *skb) preempt_disable(); err = netif_rx(skb); - if (softirq_pending(smp_processor_id())) + if (local_softirq_pending()) do_softirq(); preempt_enable();