netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
To: Stephen Smalley <sds@epoch.ncsc.mil>
Cc: Ross Kendall Axe <ross.axe@blueyonder.co.uk>,
	netdev@oss.sgi.com, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	jmorris@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] linux 2.9.10-rc1: Fix oops in unix_dgram_sendmsg when using SELinux and SOCK_SEQPACKET
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 00:41:25 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041116004122.V14339@build.pdx.osdl.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1100525477.31773.38.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil>; from sds@epoch.ncsc.mil on Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 08:31:17AM -0500

* Stephen Smalley (sds@epoch.ncsc.mil) wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-11-14 at 13:13, Ross Kendall Axe wrote:
> > With CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK=y and CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX=y, using
> > SOCK_SEQPACKET unix domain sockets causes an oops in the superfluous(?)
> > call to security_unix_may_send in sock_dgram_sendmsg. This patch avoids
> > making this call for SOCK_SEQPACKET sockets.
> 
> I'd prefer to track down the actual issue in the SELinux code and
> correct it than just omit the security hook call entirely.  Do you have
> the Oops output and a trivial test case?  Thanks.

Well, there is one simple case that will trigger the Oops.  Send a
SEQPACKET to a connected but not yet accepted socket.  In this case
other->sk_socket is still NULL, and SELinux will deref the NULL pointer
in selinux_socket_may_send() when geting other_isec.  There is already
a check in unix_stream_connect, which is all that's used for normal unix
stream sockets.  But the seqpacket socket then uses unix_dgram_sendmsg,
so triggers the may_send check as well.

thanks,
-chris
-- 
Linux Security Modules     http://lsm.immunix.org     http://lsm.bkbits.net

  reply	other threads:[~2004-11-16  8:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-11-14 18:13 [PATCH] linux 2.9.10-rc1: Fix oops in unix_dgram_sendmsg when using SELinux and SOCK_SEQPACKET Ross Kendall Axe
2004-11-15 13:31 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-11-16  8:41   ` Chris Wright [this message]
2004-11-17 21:29     ` Ross Kendall Axe
2004-11-18  0:09       ` Ross Kendall Axe
2004-11-18  3:42         ` James Morris
2004-11-18  4:25           ` James Morris
2004-11-18  6:07             ` Chris Wright
2004-11-18  7:25           ` Ross Kendall Axe
2004-11-18  7:59             ` James Morris
2004-11-18  8:27               ` James Morris
2004-11-18 16:44                 ` Chris Wright
2004-11-18 17:01                   ` James Morris
2004-11-18 17:07                     ` Chris Wright
2004-11-18 17:11                       ` James Morris
2004-11-18 17:25                     ` James Morris
2004-11-18 16:58                       ` Alan Cox
2004-11-18 22:34                       ` David S. Miller
2004-11-19  3:23                   ` Ross Kendall Axe
2004-11-19  7:19                     ` Chris Wright
2004-11-19  9:40                       ` Ross Kendall Axe
2004-11-19 13:05                       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2004-11-19 13:16                         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2004-11-18 16:49                 ` Alan Cox
2004-11-18 18:40                   ` James Morris
2004-11-18 23:39                     ` Alan Cox
2004-11-19  3:12                       ` James Morris
2004-11-19  7:01                         ` Chris Wright
2004-11-19  7:12                           ` James Morris
2004-11-19  7:28                             ` Chris Wright
2004-11-19 11:39                         ` Alan Cox
2004-11-19 16:24                           ` James Morris
2004-11-20  7:11                             ` David S. Miller
2004-11-18 16:45           ` Alan Cox
2004-11-18 18:28             ` James Morris
2004-11-18 18:34             ` Chris Wright

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20041116004122.V14339@build.pdx.osdl.net \
    --to=chrisw@osdl.org \
    --cc=jmorris@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=ross.axe@blueyonder.co.uk \
    --cc=sds@epoch.ncsc.mil \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).