From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Ian Campbell <icampbell@arcom.com>
Cc: nico@cam.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: "deadlock" between smc91x driver and link_watch
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 15:31:58 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041123153158.6f20a7d7.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1101230194.14370.12.camel@icampbell-debian>
Ian Campbell <icampbell@arcom.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm seeing a deadlock in linkwatch_event() when bringing down an
> Ethernet interface using the smc91x driver (drivers/net/smc91x.c).
>
> What I am seeing is that smc_close() is calling netif_carrier_off which
> has the call chain:
> netif_carrier_off
> -> linkwatch_fire_event
> -> schedule_work or schedule_delayed_work
> The function that is scheduled is linkwatch_event().
>
> smc_close() then goes on to call flush_scheduled_work() in order to
> ensure that it's own pending workqueue stuff (smc_phy_configure()) is
> completed before powering down the PHY.
>
> What I am seeing is that linkwatch_event() is deadlocking trying take
> rtnl_sem via rtnl_shlock(). The lock appears to already be held by a
> call to rtnl_lock() from devinet_ioctl().
>
> Any ideas? Perhaps smc_phy_configure calls could just check that the
> interface is up before continuing, then there would be no need to flush
> the queue to get rid of it.
>
linkwatch probably doesn't need the flush_scheduled_work(), because it
correctly does refcounting on the device. Presumably that
flush_scheduled_work() in smc_close() is there to force out any pending
calls to smc_phy_configure().
One possible fix would be to remove that flush_scheduled_work() and to do
refcounting around smc_phy_configure(): dev_hold() when scheduling the work
(if schedule_work() returned true), dev_put() in the handler.
next parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-23 23:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1101230194.14370.12.camel@icampbell-debian>
2004-11-23 23:31 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2004-11-24 9:41 ` "deadlock" between smc91x driver and link_watch Ian Campbell
2004-11-24 9:46 ` Andrew Morton
2004-11-24 9:58 ` Ian Campbell
2004-11-24 15:21 ` Nicolas Pitre
2004-11-24 15:52 ` Ian Campbell
2004-11-24 16:57 ` Nicolas Pitre
2004-11-24 17:13 ` Ian Campbell
2004-11-25 9:59 ` Ian Campbell
2004-11-25 16:31 ` Nicolas Pitre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041123153158.6f20a7d7.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=icampbell@arcom.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=nico@cam.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).