From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: efficient port randomisation (revised) Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 15:01:21 -0800 Message-ID: <20041202150121.488ec205@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net> References: <20041027092531.78fe438c@guest-251-240.pdx.osdl.net> <200411020854.44745.michael.vittrup.larsen@ericsson.com> <20041104100104.570e67cd@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net> <200411051103.59032.michael.vittrup.larsen@ericsson.com> <20041117153025.160eaa04@zqx3.pdx.osdl.net> <20041130214643.7b72300e.davem@davemloft.net> <20041201152446.3a0d5ce3@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net> <20041201204622.7b760400.davem@davemloft.net> <20041202134930.132d7bd8@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net> <20041202135252.04e64f51.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: michael.vittrup.larsen@ericsson.com, netdev@oss.sgi.com Return-path: To: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20041202135252.04e64f51.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 13:52:52 -0800 "David S. Miller" wrote: > On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 13:49:30 -0800 > Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > These are run on a relatively slow machine (2 way Pentium III 850Mhz) > > and it looks like the results are no change (in the noise). > > Or averaged out, about 1ms more expensive. We could always benchmark special the loopback case since there is no risk of man-in-the-middle attacks.