From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lennert Buytenhek Subject: Re: 1.03Mpps on e1000 (was: Re: Transmission limit) Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 13:11:51 +0100 Message-ID: <20041206121151.GA12598@xi.wantstofly.org> References: <20041201182943.GA14470@xi.wantstofly.org> <20041201213550.GF14470@xi.wantstofly.org> <1101967983.4782.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20041205145051.GA647@xi.wantstofly.org> <20041205174401.GJ647@xi.wantstofly.org> <20041205175133.GK647@xi.wantstofly.org> <1102332757.1042.2255.camel@jzny.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Martin Josefsson , Scott Feldman , Robert Olsson , P@draigBrady.com, mellia@prezzemolo.polito.it, e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Jorge Manuel Finochietto , Giulio Galante , netdev@oss.sgi.com Return-path: To: jamal Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1102332757.1042.2255.camel@jzny.localdomain> Sender: e1000-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: e1000-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 06:32:37AM -0500, jamal wrote: > Someone correct me if i am wrong - but does it appear as if all these > changes are only useful on PCI but not PCI-X? They are useful on PCI-X as well as regular PCI. On my 64/100 NIC I get ~620kpps on 2.6.9, ~1Mpps with 2.6.9 plus tx rework plus TXDMAC=0. Martin gets the ~1Mpps number with just the tx rework, and even more with TXDMAC=0 added in as well. --L ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/