From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Karsten Desler Subject: Re: _High_ CPU usage while routing (mostly) small UDP packets Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 05:02:35 +0100 Message-ID: <20041207040235.GA10501@soohrt.org> References: <20041206224107.GA8529@soohrt.org> <20041207002012.GB30674@quickstop.soohrt.org> <1102387595.1088.48.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20041207025456.GA525@soohrt.org> <1102389533.1089.51.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20041207032438.GA7767@soohrt.org> <1102390241.1093.59.camel@jzny.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Cc: Bernd Eckenfels , "David S. Miller" , netdev@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: To: jamal Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1102390241.1093.59.camel@jzny.localdomain> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org * jamal wrote: > Beats me. Make sure it boots NAPI. Also if you can turn off ITR; intel > loves to turn on that silly feature. ITR was in fact activated. I think i've disabled it now (e1000.InterruptThrottleRate=0 in the kernel cmdline). And as I'm reading the e1000 code, there is no way to enable/disable NAPI without a recompile. So the fact that ethtool spat out -NAPI in the version string means that NAPI is actually used. - Karsten