From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix select() for SOCK_RAW sockets (ipv6) Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 10:48:15 -0800 Message-ID: <20041207104815.3f7a4684.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20041207045302.GA23746@linuxace.com> <20041207054840.GD61527@gaz.sfgoth.com> <20041207150834.GA75700@gaz.sfgoth.com> <20041208.023530.26430801.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> <20041207100140.781f4c00@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, mitch@sfgoth.com, kernel@linuxace.com, linux-net@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com Return-path: To: Stephen Hemminger In-Reply-To: <20041207100140.781f4c00@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net> Sender: linux-net-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 10:01:40 -0800 Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > Probably, we need to do the same for ipv6, don't we? > > diff -Nru a/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c b/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c > --- a/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c 2004-12-07 10:02:50 -08:00 > +++ b/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c 2004-12-07 10:02:50 -08:00 > @@ -513,6 +513,27 @@ We didn't do the "UDP select() fix" on ipv6 because we don't have the delayed checksumming optimization there. So the ipv6 side really doesn't need this change. Or did I miss something?