From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Phil Oester Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix select() for SOCK_RAW sockets Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 09:28:12 -0800 Message-ID: <20041207172812.GA25810@linuxace.com> References: <20041207003525.GA22933@linuxace.com> <20041207025218.GB61527@gaz.sfgoth.com> <20041207045302.GA23746@linuxace.com> <20041207054840.GD61527@gaz.sfgoth.com> <20041207150834.GA75700@gaz.sfgoth.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "David S. Miller" , shemminger@osdl.org, linux-net@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com Return-path: To: Mitchell Blank Jr Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041207150834.GA75700@gaz.sfgoth.com> Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 07:08:34AM -0800, Mitchell Blank Jr wrote: > Phil: Here's a real patch for you to test. I actually left inet_dgram_ops > alone since it's an exported symbol (two of the users just want the .do_ioctl > value which is the same between SOCK_DGRAM and SOCK_RAW; the other is ipv6 > where it's clearly dealing with a UDP socket -- therefore I think its safest > to leave inet_dgram_ops to have the UDP behavior) > > Davem: I only tested that this doesn't break UDP; if it works for Phil and > Stephen can verify that it doesn't break his bad-checksum UDP tests then > please push it for 2.6.10. Yup, that does indeed fix it for me, thanks. Phil