From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adrian Bunk Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] net/sched/: possible cleanups Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 02:00:25 +0100 Message-ID: <20041218010024.GD21288@stusta.de> References: <20041215012754.GH12937@stusta.de> <41BF9A95.5050902@conectiva.com.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com Return-path: To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41BF9A95.5050902@conectiva.com.br> Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 11:59:49PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Adrian Bunk wrote: > >The patch below contans the following possible cleanups: > >- make some needlessly global code static > >- sch_htb.c: #undef HTB_DEBUG > > > > > >diffstat output: > > include/net/act_api.h | 3 --- > > Adrian, may I suggest that you post the networking related patches > only to netdev? Until now I thought it's never a bad idea to Cc linux-kernel on any patches. Is there a specific reason why you consider this being a bad thing (well, bandwith shouldn't be that much of an issue considering how high-volume linux-kernel is...)? > - Arnaldo cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed