From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
To: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
Cc: kaber@trash.net, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PKT_SCHED: Fix double locking in tcindex destroy path
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 15:36:24 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041220153624.58a1d93e.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041210124445.GV1371@postel.suug.ch>
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 13:44:45 +0100
Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> wrote:
> * Patrick McHardy <41B90B81.1020102@trash.net> 2004-12-10 03:35
> > Thomas Graf wrote:
> >
> > >tcindex's destroy uses its own delete functions to destroy its
> > >configuration. The delete function (correctly) takes the qdisc_tree_lock
> > >to prevent list walkings from happening while removing from the list.
> > >The qdisc_tree_lock is already held if we're comming via the destroy
> > >path and thus a double locking takes place.
> > >
> > >Patch not needed for 2.4 since both destroy paths are unlocked but will
> > >be needed if we add them.
> > >
> > >
> > Looks correct, but 2.4 does need this. qdisc_destroy in 2.4 always
> > happens under dev->queue_lock. For example dev_shutdown from 2.4:
>
> Not 100% correct since cls_api.c drops the lock before calling
> tcf_destroy but the patch is indeed needed and it's not a problem
> if dev->queue_lock is not taken since it is already unlinked as you
> correctly stated in your previous mail. Thanks Patrick.
>
> Patch also applies to 2.4 with some fuzz.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
I think the conditional locking is quite ugly, but I can't
suggest something better at this time.
Patch applied to both 2.4.x and 2.6.x, thanks Patrick
and Thomas.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-20 23:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-10 1:49 [PATCH] PKT_SCHED: Fix double locking in tcindex destroy path Thomas Graf
2004-12-10 2:35 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-12-10 12:44 ` Thomas Graf
2004-12-20 23:36 ` David S. Miller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041220153624.58a1d93e.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).