netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
To: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
Cc: kaber@trash.net, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PKT_SCHED: Fix double locking in tcindex destroy path
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 15:36:24 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041220153624.58a1d93e.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041210124445.GV1371@postel.suug.ch>

On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 13:44:45 +0100
Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> wrote:

> * Patrick McHardy <41B90B81.1020102@trash.net> 2004-12-10 03:35
> > Thomas Graf wrote:
> > 
> > >tcindex's destroy uses its own delete functions to destroy its
> > >configuration. The delete function (correctly) takes the qdisc_tree_lock
> > >to prevent list walkings from happening while removing from the list.
> > >The qdisc_tree_lock is already held if we're comming via the destroy
> > >path and thus a double locking takes place.
> > >
> > >Patch not needed for 2.4 since both destroy paths are unlocked but will
> > >be needed if we add them.
> > > 
> > >
> > Looks correct, but 2.4 does need this. qdisc_destroy in 2.4 always
> > happens under dev->queue_lock. For example dev_shutdown from 2.4:
> 
> Not 100% correct since cls_api.c drops the lock before calling
> tcf_destroy but the patch is indeed needed and it's not a problem
> if dev->queue_lock is not taken since it is already unlinked as you
> correctly stated in your previous mail. Thanks Patrick.
> 
> Patch also applies to 2.4 with some fuzz.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>

I think the conditional locking is quite ugly, but I can't
suggest something better at this time.

Patch applied to both 2.4.x and 2.6.x, thanks Patrick
and Thomas.

      reply	other threads:[~2004-12-20 23:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-12-10  1:49 [PATCH] PKT_SCHED: Fix double locking in tcindex destroy path Thomas Graf
2004-12-10  2:35 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-12-10 12:44   ` Thomas Graf
2004-12-20 23:36     ` David S. Miller [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20041220153624.58a1d93e.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).