From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: [PATCH][v4][0/24] Second InfiniBand merge candidate patch set Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 21:26:15 -0800 Message-ID: <20041227212615.0536c99f.davem@davemloft.net> References: <200412192214.KlDxQ7icOmxHYIf0@topspin.com> <20041220.153845.70996857.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> <20041227210007.398734cd.davem@davemloft.net> <52k6r3j8yp.fsf@topspin.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: akpm@osdl.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, openib-general@openib.org, torvalds@osdl.org Return-path: To: Roland Dreier In-Reply-To: <52k6r3j8yp.fsf@topspin.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: openib-general-bounces@openib.org Errors-To: openib-general-bounces@openib.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 21:19:26 -0800 Roland Dreier wrote: > Dave, did you want to handle the entire merge of the whole IB stack, > or just the net/ parts, which are pretty trivial and stand alone, > since AF_INFINIBAND is already defined in the tree? Send it all over.