From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
To: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] ematch API, u32 ematch, nbyte ematch, basic classifier
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:09:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050105110917.GP26856@postel.suug.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1104893694.1124.37.camel@jzny.localdomain>
* jamal <1104893694.1124.37.camel@jzny.localdomain> 2005-01-04 21:54
> I think this is a debate that can be easily settled ;->
> Agreed logic will beat brute force smartness and u32 is not exactly
> for the faint hearted. And its usability is extremely poor - but lets
> maintain its power as is.
Absolutely.
> > Using what key? We have no knowledge about what the ematches want to
> > see or not.
>
> Ok, good question ;->
> Maybe you should have own some 32 bit key?
Actually the goal of basic is to be an alternative to u32
if hashing is not required because I think adding hashing
will simply result in a duplication of u32.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-05 11:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-03 12:56 [RFC] ematch API, u32 ematch, nbyte ematch, basic classifier Thomas Graf
2005-01-04 4:13 ` jamal
2005-01-04 12:03 ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-04 13:19 ` jamal
2005-01-04 13:46 ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-04 12:27 ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-04 13:22 ` jamal
2005-01-04 13:41 ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-05 2:54 ` jamal
2005-01-05 11:09 ` Thomas Graf [this message]
2005-01-04 22:36 ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-05 3:12 ` jamal
2005-01-05 11:00 ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-05 13:33 ` jamal
2005-01-05 14:45 ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-05 16:48 ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-06 14:03 ` jamal
2005-01-06 13:47 ` jamal
2005-01-06 19:41 ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-07 13:45 ` jamal
2005-01-08 14:54 ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-10 13:26 ` jamal
2005-01-10 21:17 ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-10 22:05 ` jamal
2005-01-10 23:30 ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-13 17:41 ` [RFC] meta ematch Thomas Graf
2005-01-13 18:54 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-01-13 19:20 ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-14 1:13 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-01-14 15:14 ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-16 14:58 ` jamal
2005-01-16 15:09 ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-16 15:37 ` jamal
2005-01-16 15:57 ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-16 16:19 ` jamal
2005-01-16 16:49 ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-16 16:11 ` jamal
2005-01-16 16:32 ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-16 17:18 ` jamal
2005-01-16 18:47 ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-16 16:32 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-01-16 17:24 ` jamal
2005-01-05 13:32 ` [RFC] ematch API, u32 ematch, nbyte ematch, basic classifier Florian Weimer
2005-01-05 13:45 ` jamal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050105110917.GP26856@postel.suug.ch \
--to=tgraf@suug.ch \
--cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).