From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jeremy M. Guthrie" Subject: Re: V2.4 policy router operates faster/better than V2.6 Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:17:26 -0600 Message-ID: <200501071017.31751.jeremy.guthrie@berbee.com> References: <200501031455.26980.jeremy.guthrie@berbee.com> <200501061618.24465.jeremy.guthrie@berbee.com> <16861.48463.770166.352726@robur.slu.se> Reply-To: jeremy.guthrie@berbee.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1340695.bQ2qdNF43y"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Robert Olsson , Stephen Hemminger Return-path: To: netdev@oss.sgi.com In-Reply-To: <16861.48463.770166.352726@robur.slu.se> Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org --nextPart1340695.bQ2qdNF43y Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 06 January 2005 04:35 pm, Robert Olsson wrote: > Jeremy M. Guthrie writes: > > You mentioned before that " The stats didn't show any numbers so we > > don't know your load." Was there a command you wanted me to re-run? > > rtstat should show the routing/packet load. > > From a systems like yours 2*933 MHz PIII in production for tens of > thoundans of users many filter and full BGP routing. Current (late here) > use. > > > ifstat2 eth* > RX -------------------------- TX ------------------------- > eth0 272.8 M bit/s 51 k pps 350.7 M bit/s 51 k pps > eth1 371.9 M bit/s 55 k pps 293.6 M bit/s 55 k pps > eth2 6.7 M bit/s 1348 pps 3.0 M bit/s 991 pps > eth3 472 bit/s 0 pps 600 bit/s 0 pps Ifstat output: #kernel Interface RX Pkts/Rate TX Pkts/Rate RX Data/Rate TX Data/Ra= te RX Errs/Drop TX Errs/Drop RX Over/Rate TX Coll/Ra= te lo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 eth0 1 0 1 0 66 0 178 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 eth2 0 0 30770 0 0 0 13361K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 eth3 81019 0 0 0 41740K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > rtstat > size IN: hit tot mc no_rt bcast madst masrc OUT: hit tot = =20 > mc GC: tot ignored goal_miss ovrf HASH: in_search out_search 21007 =20 > 114060 748 0 5 0 0 0 11 5 0 = =20 > 0 0 0 0 58280 4 22683 112556 8= 27 > 0 6 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 = =20 > 0 0 60841 7 24230 111083 765 0 4 = =20 > 0 0 0 13 4 0 0 0 0 0 = =20 > 66628 7 > Around 110 kpps hitting warm cache entries and ~800 new lookups/sec. I was > expecting so see something similar from your system. Did my second email w/ the lnstat data not make it? > > FYI. > cat /proc/net/softnet_stat total droppped tsquz Throttl FR_hit FR_succe FR_defer FR_def_o=20 cpu_coll=20 > 9ba490f3 00000000 01281572 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 > 002562c2 9939268d 00000000 010e42e9 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000=20 > 00000000 0028fe72 Why do these drops not show up in the interface drop? > Good Night. > > > --ro =2D-=20 =2D------------------------------------------------- Jeremy M. Guthrie jeremy.guthrie@berbee.com Senior Network Engineer Phone: 608-298-1061 Berbee Fax: 608-288-3007 5520 Research Park Drive NOC: 608-298-1102 Madison, WI 53711 --nextPart1340695.bQ2qdNF43y Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBB3rYbqtjaBHGZBeURApowAJ9tp9NRJazOm/HsVeC4ANYiDgyzjgCghJBx U1Pf8s66CXj3d7Zk3O7yBzQ= =AMaR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1340695.bQ2qdNF43y--