From: "Jeremy M. Guthrie" <jeremy.guthrie@berbee.com>
To: netdev@oss.sgi.com
Cc: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
Robert.Olsson@data.slu.se, shemminger@osdl.org
Subject: Re: V2.4 policy router operates faster/better than V2.6
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 15:11:02 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200501101511.07164.jeremy.guthrie@berbee.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0501071501510.5818-100000@localhost.localdomain>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6206 bytes --]
I rebound the card with 2048 RxDescriptors. There appears to be a burst
errors right when the port comes online. Down below is an ifconfig ; sleep
60 ; ifconfig.
I'll be tesitng Robert's patch shortly.
ethtool -S eth2
NIC statistics:
rx_packets: 0
tx_packets: 7295976
rx_bytes: 0
tx_bytes: 3413882143
rx_errors: 0
tx_errors: 0
rx_dropped: 0
tx_dropped: 0
multicast: 0
collisions: 0
rx_length_errors: 0
rx_over_errors: 0
rx_crc_errors: 0
rx_frame_errors: 0
rx_fifo_errors: 0
rx_missed_errors: 0
tx_aborted_errors: 0
tx_carrier_errors: 0
tx_fifo_errors: 0
tx_heartbeat_errors: 0
tx_window_errors: 0
tx_abort_late_coll: 0
tx_deferred_ok: 0
tx_single_coll_ok: 0
tx_multi_coll_ok: 0
rx_long_length_errors: 0
rx_short_length_errors: 0
rx_align_errors: 0
tx_tcp_seg_good: 0
tx_tcp_seg_failed: 0
rx_flow_control_xon: 0
rx_flow_control_xoff: 0
tx_flow_control_xon: 0
tx_flow_control_xoff: 0
rx_long_byte_count: 0
rx_csum_offload_good: 0
rx_csum_offload_errors: 0
ethtool -S eth3
NIC statistics:
rx_packets: 19231078
tx_packets: 5
rx_bytes: 1350479823
tx_bytes: 398
rx_errors: 522159
tx_errors: 0
rx_dropped: 320198
tx_dropped: 0
multicast: 0
collisions: 0
rx_length_errors: 0
rx_over_errors: 0
rx_crc_errors: 0
rx_frame_errors: 0
rx_fifo_errors: 201961
rx_missed_errors: 201961
tx_aborted_errors: 0
tx_carrier_errors: 0
tx_fifo_errors: 0
tx_heartbeat_errors: 0
tx_window_errors: 0
tx_abort_late_coll: 0
tx_deferred_ok: 0
tx_single_coll_ok: 0
tx_multi_coll_ok: 0
rx_long_length_errors: 0
rx_short_length_errors: 0
rx_align_errors: 0
tx_tcp_seg_good: 0
tx_tcp_seg_failed: 0
rx_flow_control_xon: 0
rx_flow_control_xoff: 0
tx_flow_control_xon: 0
tx_flow_control_xoff: 0
rx_long_byte_count: 9940414415
rx_csum_offload_good: 17879204
rx_csum_offload_errors: 8537
Mon Jan 10 15:06:26 CST 2005
eth3 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:02:B3:D5:7E:30
inet addr:10.253.0.1 Bcast:10.255.255.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::202:b3ff:fed5:7e30/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:67183383 errors:583215 dropped:583215 overruns:247258
frame:0
TX packets:5 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:1120957705 (1069.0 Mb) TX bytes:398 (398.0 b)
Base address:0x22a0 Memory:eff80000-effa0000
Mon Jan 10 15:07:26 CST 2005
eth3 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:02:B3:D5:7E:30
inet addr:10.253.0.1 Bcast:10.255.255.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::202:b3ff:fed5:7e30/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:73275567 errors:616520 dropped:616520 overruns:262517
frame:0
TX packets:5 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:337437991 (321.8 Mb) TX bytes:398 (398.0 b)
Base address:0x22a0 Memory:eff80000-effa0000
On Friday 07 January 2005 05:23 pm, Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Jeremy M. Guthrie wrote:
> > > Very interesting that with your workload the napi driver doesn't keep
> > > up (from looking at your posts in netdev) and yet the interrupt mode
> > > driver can.
> >
> > Well, I need to do more digging. One scenario the interrupt mode can
> > hand stuff off to the CPU but the network stack still drops. The other
> > scenario, the card drops.
> >
> > ethtool -S eth2
> > NIC statistics:
>
> <snip!>
>
> > tx_packets: 314550698
> > tx_bytes: 4290523139
> > ethtool -S eth3
> > NIC statistics:
>
> <snip!>
>
> > rx_packets: 719847127
> > tx_packets: 5
> > rx_bytes: 1880301945
> > tx_bytes: 398
> > rx_errors: 3368295
> > rx_dropped: 1478044
> > rx_fifo_errors: 1890251
> > rx_missed_errors: 1890251
> > rx_long_byte_count: 379837423993
> > rx_csum_offload_good: 672891990
> > rx_csum_offload_errors: 178666
>
> Okay, well, rx_dropped means "receive no buffers count" in our driver, but
> doesn't necessarily mean that the packet was completely dropped it just
> means that the fifo may have had to queue up the packet on the adapter as
> best it could and wait for the OS to provide more skb's, this may or may
> not lead to further errors...
>
> Now, the rx_fifo errors is from hardware counter "missed packet count"
> which means that a packet was dropped because the fifo was full (probably
> indicated at least some of the time because the card was in "receive no
> buffers" state) btw fifo errors and rx_missed are both being fed by the
> same hardware counter.
>
> rx_csum_offload_errors is somewhat worrisome because it means that you're
> receiving packets that appear to be corrupted. This could be from any
> number of sources, but is most likely a misconfigured station on your lan
> or something is corrupting checksums (a tcpdump would help debug here, but
> would really slow things down) The packets are NOT dropped, but handed to
> the stack to decide what to do.
>
> So, to mitigate the rnbc "receive no buffers count" a little you can
> provide some more buffering on the receive side by loading the module with
> RxDescriptors=2048 or something larger than the default of 256. this will
> help (if you haven't already) but will also probably increase the amount
> of work your system has to do, as more packets will be able to be stored
> up.
--
--------------------------------------------------
Jeremy M. Guthrie jeremy.guthrie@berbee.com
Senior Network Engineer Phone: 608-298-1061
Berbee Fax: 608-288-3007
5520 Research Park Drive NOC: 608-298-1102
Madison, WI 53711
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-10 21:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200501071619.54566.jeremy.guthrie@berbee.com>
2005-01-07 23:23 ` V2.4 policy router operates faster/better than V2.6 Jesse Brandeburg
2005-01-10 21:11 ` Jeremy M. Guthrie [this message]
[not found] <C925F8B43D79CC49ACD0601FB68FF50C02D39006@orsmsx408>
2005-01-13 22:55 ` Jeremy M. Guthrie
2005-01-03 20:55 Jeremy M. Guthrie
2005-01-03 22:51 ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-01-03 22:56 ` Jeremy M. Guthrie
2005-01-05 13:18 ` Robert Olsson
2005-01-05 15:18 ` Jeremy M. Guthrie
2005-01-05 16:30 ` Robert Olsson
2005-01-05 17:35 ` Jeremy M. Guthrie
2005-01-05 19:25 ` Jeremy M. Guthrie
2005-01-05 20:22 ` Robert Olsson
2005-01-05 20:52 ` Jeremy M. Guthrie
2005-01-06 15:26 ` Jeremy M. Guthrie
2005-01-06 18:15 ` Robert Olsson
2005-01-06 19:35 ` Jeremy M. Guthrie
2005-01-06 20:29 ` Robert Olsson
2005-01-06 20:54 ` Jeremy M. Guthrie
2005-01-06 20:55 ` Jeremy M. Guthrie
2005-01-06 21:19 ` Jeremy M. Guthrie
2005-01-06 21:36 ` Robert Olsson
2005-01-06 21:46 ` Jeremy M. Guthrie
2005-01-06 22:11 ` Robert Olsson
2005-01-06 22:18 ` Jeremy M. Guthrie
2005-01-06 22:35 ` Robert Olsson
2005-01-07 16:17 ` Jeremy M. Guthrie
2005-01-07 19:18 ` Robert Olsson
2005-01-07 19:38 ` Jeremy M. Guthrie
2005-01-07 20:07 ` Robert Olsson
2005-01-07 20:14 ` Jeremy M. Guthrie
2005-01-07 20:40 ` Robert Olsson
2005-01-07 21:06 ` Jeremy M. Guthrie
2005-01-07 21:30 ` Robert Olsson
2005-01-11 15:11 ` Jeremy M. Guthrie
2005-01-07 22:28 ` Jesse Brandeburg
2005-01-07 22:50 ` Jeremy M. Guthrie
2005-01-07 22:57 ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-01-11 15:17 ` Jeremy M. Guthrie
2005-01-11 16:40 ` Robert Olsson
2005-01-12 1:27 ` Jeremy M. Guthrie
2005-01-12 15:11 ` Robert Olsson
2005-01-12 16:24 ` Jeremy M. Guthrie
2005-01-12 19:27 ` Robert Olsson
2005-01-12 20:11 ` Jeremy M. Guthrie
2005-01-12 20:21 ` Robert Olsson
2005-01-12 20:30 ` Jeremy M. Guthrie
2005-01-12 20:45 ` Jeremy M. Guthrie
2005-01-12 22:02 ` Robert Olsson
2005-01-12 22:21 ` Jeremy M. Guthrie
[not found] ` <16869.42247.126428.508479@robur.slu.se>
2005-01-12 22:42 ` Jeremy M. Guthrie
2005-01-12 22:47 ` Jeremy M. Guthrie
2005-01-12 23:19 ` Robert Olsson
2005-01-12 23:23 ` Jeremy M. Guthrie
2005-01-13 8:56 ` Robert Olsson
2005-01-13 19:28 ` Jeremy M. Guthrie
2005-01-13 20:00 ` David S. Miller
2005-01-13 20:43 ` Jeremy M. Guthrie
2005-01-13 23:13 ` David S. Miller
2005-01-13 21:12 ` Robert Olsson
2005-01-13 22:27 ` Jeremy M. Guthrie
2005-01-14 15:44 ` Robert Olsson
2005-01-14 14:59 ` Jeremy M. Guthrie
2005-01-14 16:05 ` Robert Olsson
2005-01-14 19:00 ` Jeremy M. Guthrie
2005-01-14 19:26 ` Jeremy M. Guthrie
2005-01-16 12:32 ` Robert Olsson
2005-01-16 16:22 ` Jeremy M. Guthrie
2005-01-19 15:03 ` Jeremy M. Guthrie
2005-01-19 22:18 ` Robert Olsson
2005-01-20 1:50 ` Jeremy M. Guthrie
2005-01-20 11:30 ` Robert Olsson
2005-01-20 14:37 ` Jeremy M. Guthrie
2005-01-20 17:01 ` Robert Olsson
2005-01-20 17:14 ` Jeremy M. Guthrie
2005-01-20 21:53 ` Robert Olsson
2005-01-21 21:20 ` Jeremy M. Guthrie
2005-01-21 15:23 ` Robert Olsson
2005-01-21 21:24 ` Jeremy M. Guthrie
2005-01-31 15:37 ` Jeremy M. Guthrie
2005-01-31 18:06 ` Robert Olsson
2005-01-12 22:05 ` Jeremy M. Guthrie
2005-01-12 22:22 ` Robert Olsson
2005-01-12 22:30 ` Jeremy M. Guthrie
2005-01-11 17:17 ` Jeremy M. Guthrie
2005-01-11 18:46 ` Robert Olsson
2005-01-12 1:30 ` Jeremy M. Guthrie
2005-01-12 16:02 ` Robert Olsson
2005-01-04 15:07 ` Jeremy M. Guthrie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200501101511.07164.jeremy.guthrie@berbee.com \
--to=jeremy.guthrie@berbee.com \
--cc=Robert.Olsson@data.slu.se \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).