From: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: [PATCH] netpoll: fix NAPI polling race on SMP
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 14:30:19 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050111223019.GC2940@waste.org> (raw)
This avoids a nasty NAPI race by checking that work was actually
scheduled for the CPU netpoll is running on and pulls the
NAPI-specific code out into a separate function.
Original idea from Jeff Moyer
Tested by Andrew Tridgell
Signed-off-by: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Index: netpoll/net/core/netpoll.c
===================================================================
--- netpoll.orig/net/core/netpoll.c 2005-01-10 14:34:49.058616769 -0800
+++ netpoll/net/core/netpoll.c 2005-01-10 14:52:49.799833988 -0800
@@ -65,27 +65,25 @@
return csum_fold(skb_checksum(skb, 0, skb->len, skb->csum));
}
-void netpoll_poll(struct netpoll *np)
+/*
+ * Check whether delayed processing was scheduled for our current CPU,
+ * and then manually invoke NAPI polling to pump data off the card.
+ *
+ * In cases where there is bi-directional communications, reading only
+ * one message at a time can lead to packets being dropped by the
+ * network adapter, forcing superfluous retries and possibly timeouts.
+ * Thus, we set our budget to greater than 1.
+ */
+static void poll_napi(struct netpoll *np)
{
- /*
- * In cases where there is bi-directional communications, reading
- * only one message at a time can lead to packets being dropped by
- * the network adapter, forcing superfluous retries and possibly
- * timeouts. Thus, we set our budget to a more reasonable value.
- */
int budget = 16;
unsigned long flags;
+ struct softnet_data *queue;
- if(!np->dev || !netif_running(np->dev) || !np->dev->poll_controller)
- return;
-
- /* Process pending work on NIC */
- np->dev->poll_controller(np->dev);
-
- /* If scheduling is stopped, tickle NAPI bits */
spin_lock_irqsave(&netpoll_poll_lock, flags);
- if (np->dev->poll &&
- test_bit(__LINK_STATE_RX_SCHED, &np->dev->state)) {
+ queue = &__get_cpu_var(softnet_data);
+ if (test_bit(__LINK_STATE_RX_SCHED, &np->dev->state) &&
+ !list_empty(&queue->poll_list)) {
np->dev->netpoll_rx |= NETPOLL_RX_DROP;
atomic_inc(&trapped);
@@ -95,6 +93,17 @@
np->dev->netpoll_rx &= ~NETPOLL_RX_DROP;
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&netpoll_poll_lock, flags);
+}
+
+void netpoll_poll(struct netpoll *np)
+{
+ if(!np->dev || !netif_running(np->dev) || !np->dev->poll_controller)
+ return;
+
+ /* Process pending work on NIC */
+ np->dev->poll_controller(np->dev);
+ if (np->dev->poll)
+ poll_napi(np);
zap_completion_queue();
}
--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
reply other threads:[~2005-01-11 22:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050111223019.GC2940@waste.org \
--to=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).