From: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@wantstofly.org>
To: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
Cc: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>,
netdev@oss.sgi.com, shemminger@osdl.org,
shollenbeck@verisign.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] etherip: Ethernet-in-IPv4 tunneling
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:22:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050116202254.GD22165@xi.wantstofly.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1105905906.1097.860.camel@jzny.localdomain>
On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 03:05:06PM -0500, jamal wrote:
> > Apparently they mis-read the RFC and write the etherip header as 0x0300
> > instead of 0x3000 (they have the version nibble in the wrong place.) This
> > would likely prevent interoperability.
>
> Thinking about it a bit - you should be able to break yours to do 0x0300
> to test with them ;->
Etherip is a really simple standard, the header is only 16 bits which
can only assume a single value (0x3000). Looking at encapsulated packets
with tcpdump makes me 99.99% confident that it's all okay on that level.
--L
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-16 20:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-12 22:24 [PATCH][RFC] etherip: Ethernet-in-IPv4 tunneling Lennert Buytenhek
2005-01-12 22:42 ` Ben Greear
2005-01-12 22:48 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2005-01-12 23:11 ` Ben Greear
2005-01-12 23:16 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2005-01-12 23:43 ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-13 0:18 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2005-01-13 0:28 ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-13 0:36 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2005-01-13 1:20 ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-12 23:43 ` Ben Greear
2005-01-13 0:04 ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-01-13 0:29 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2005-01-13 7:49 ` Pekka Savola
2005-01-13 9:23 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2005-01-16 17:37 ` jamal
2005-01-16 18:55 ` tunneling in linux (was: Re: [PATCH][RFC] etherip: Ethernet-in-IPv4 tunneling) Lennert Buytenhek
2005-01-16 19:51 ` Pekka Savola
2005-01-16 19:57 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2005-01-17 5:45 ` Pekka Savola
2005-01-16 20:02 ` jamal
2005-01-16 20:20 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2005-01-16 20:37 ` Hasso Tepper
2005-01-16 21:21 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2005-01-16 21:32 ` Hasso Tepper
2005-01-16 21:44 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2005-01-16 23:09 ` jamal
2005-01-16 19:02 ` [PATCH][RFC] etherip: Ethernet-in-IPv4 tunneling Lennert Buytenhek
2005-01-16 20:05 ` jamal
2005-01-16 20:22 ` Lennert Buytenhek [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050116202254.GD22165@xi.wantstofly.org \
--to=buytenh@wantstofly.org \
--cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=pekkas@netcore.fi \
--cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
--cc=shollenbeck@verisign.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).