From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Hasso Tepper <hasso@estpak.ee>
Subject: Re: tunneling in linux (was: Re: [PATCH][RFC] etherip: Ethernet-in-IPv4 tunneling)
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 23:32:38 +0200
Message-ID: <200501162332.38798.hasso@estpak.ee>
References: <20050112222437.GC14280@xi.wantstofly.org> <200501162237.33743.hasso@estpak.ee> <20050116212124.GF22165@xi.wantstofly.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>, netdev@oss.sgi.com,
        Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>, shemminger@osdl.org,
        shollenbeck@verisign.com
Return-path: <netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com>
To: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@wantstofly.org>
In-Reply-To: <20050116212124.GF22165@xi.wantstofly.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 10:37:33PM +0200, Hasso Tepper wrote:
> > > > BTW, have you looked at any of the L2VPN stuff? browse the ietf web
> > > > page. Some interesting stuff there.
> > >
> > > The L2TP RFC (RFC 2661, is that the same thing?) is 170kB, which
> > > scared me off somewhat.
> >
> > If L2TP, then v3 probably - RFC3931.
>
> That RFC appears not to exist.

Hmmm. Yes, seems that there was decision for yet another draft before 3931 
was made official. Some sites contain info about it though. So official one 
at the moment:

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-l2tpext-l2tp-base-15.txt


-- 
Hasso Tepper
Elion Enterprises Ltd.
WAN administrator