netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
To: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
Cc: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@wantstofly.org>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>,
	netdev@oss.sgi.com, Werner Almesberger <werner@almesberger.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC] batched tc to improve change throughput
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 16:07:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050118150723.GT26856@postel.suug.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1106059431.1035.101.camel@jzny.localdomain>

* jamal <1106059431.1035.101.camel@jzny.localdomain> 2005-01-18 09:43
> On Tue, 2005-01-18 at 09:36, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 09:29:52AM -0500, jamal wrote:
> 
> > If you do this, please consider using Juniper config syntax instead
> > of doing it the Cisco/quagga way.
> > 
> 
> Juniper is XML driven config files?
> [I am hoping Thomas would do it, btw;-> only if we strongly disagree
> then i will be tempted to provide an alternative]. 

I'm sure we can find somethign everyone ges along with just fine.
Iff we do the XML thing we might want to try to stick to the ietf
netconf thoughts.

> btw, libio uses libevent; i recall you said you had some alternative to
> it.

libio couldbe put underneath libreadline but it doesn't make much sense,
I think remote shells do the job just fine. I'd favour a XML protocol
like netconf if we want to follow the remote configuration path.
Endianess issues will hit us quite hard though.

  reply	other threads:[~2005-01-18 15:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-01-17 15:23 [RFC] batched tc to improve change throughput Thomas Graf
2005-01-17 15:45 ` jamal
2005-01-17 16:05   ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-17 16:36     ` jamal
2005-01-17 16:56       ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-17 22:49         ` jamal
2005-01-18 13:44           ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-18 14:29             ` jamal
2005-01-18 14:36               ` Lennert Buytenhek
2005-01-18 14:43                 ` jamal
2005-01-18 15:07                   ` Thomas Graf [this message]
2005-01-18 15:20                   ` Lennert Buytenhek
2005-01-19 14:24                     ` jamal
2005-01-18 14:58               ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-18 15:23                 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2005-01-19 14:13                 ` jamal
2005-01-19 14:36                   ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-19 16:45                   ` Werner Almesberger
2005-01-19 16:54                   ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-20 14:42                     ` jamal
2005-01-20 15:35                       ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-20 17:06                         ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-01-20 17:19                           ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-24 14:13                         ` jamal
2005-01-24 15:06                           ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-26 13:48                             ` jamal
2005-01-26 14:35                               ` Thomas Graf
2005-02-11 15:07                               ` Dan Siemon
2005-02-12 13:45                                 ` jamal
2005-02-12 14:29                                   ` Thomas Graf
2005-02-12 22:07                                   ` Dan Siemon
2005-02-12 22:32                                     ` Thomas Graf
2005-02-14  0:23                                       ` Dan Siemon
2005-02-14 14:27                                         ` Thomas Graf
2005-02-15 20:28                                           ` Dan Siemon
2005-02-15 20:47                                             ` Thomas Graf
2005-02-22 21:40                                               ` Dan Siemon
2005-02-22 23:15                                                 ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-18 15:07               ` Werner Almesberger
2005-01-19 14:08                 ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-19 16:33                   ` Werner Almesberger
2005-01-19 17:22                     ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-17 18:00 ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-01-17 18:02 ` Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050118150723.GT26856@postel.suug.ch \
    --to=tgraf@suug.ch \
    --cc=buytenh@wantstofly.org \
    --cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
    --cc=werner@almesberger.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).