From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
To: Martin Josefsson <gandalf@wlug.westbo.se>
Cc: bdschuym@pandora.be, shemminger@osdl.org, dwmw2@infradead.org,
ak@suse.de, snort2004@mail.ru, bridge@osdl.org,
netdev@oss.sgi.com, rusty@rustcorp.com.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Reduce call chain length in netfilter (was: Re: do_IRQ: stack overflow: 872..)
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 22:05:58 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050125220558.6e824f8a.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1106496509.1085.1.camel@tux.rsn.bth.se>
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 17:08:29 +0100
Martin Josefsson <gandalf@wlug.westbo.se> wrote:
> I'm now running a kernel with this patch and everything seems to still
> be working.
> So unless someone else has something to comment I think this should be
> applied.
> The decrease in call-depth is important.
I would like to see at least one ACK from the netfilter
folks. Bart or Rusty, could you forward to patch to
netfilter-devel for review?
I have some other ideas about how bridging might be able
to save some call chain depth... but I need to think about
it some more before proposing or even trying to implement.
(basically something akin to how we do route level packet
output, via dst_output(), but instead we're doing this
at ->hard_start_xmit() time)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-26 6:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1131604877.20041218092730@mail.ru.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2004-12-18 7:50 ` do_IRQ: stack overflow: 872 Andi Kleen
2004-12-18 11:12 ` Bart De Schuymer
2004-12-18 11:14 ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-18 11:51 ` Bart De Schuymer
2004-12-18 13:53 ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-18 16:07 ` Re[2]: " Crazy AMD K7
2004-12-18 16:46 ` Bart De Schuymer
2005-01-07 17:05 ` David Woodhouse
2005-01-07 18:00 ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-01-07 18:06 ` David Woodhouse
2005-01-07 21:27 ` Bart De Schuymer
2005-01-18 21:57 ` David S. Miller
2005-01-22 22:30 ` [PATCH/RFC] Reduce call chain length in netfilter (was: Re: do_IRQ: stack overflow: 872..) Bart De Schuymer
2005-01-22 23:22 ` Martin Josefsson
2005-01-23 12:40 ` Bart De Schuymer
2005-01-23 16:08 ` Martin Josefsson
2005-01-26 6:05 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2005-01-26 9:08 ` Bart De Schuymer
2005-01-26 23:49 ` [PATCH/RFC] Reduce call chain length in netfilter Patrick McHardy
2005-01-27 7:18 ` David S. Miller
2005-01-27 17:50 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-01-27 19:47 ` David S. Miller
2005-01-27 21:16 ` Bart De Schuymer
2005-01-27 22:48 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-01-27 23:24 ` David S. Miller
2005-01-28 0:08 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-01-28 0:29 ` Rusty Russell
2005-01-28 1:10 ` David S. Miller
2005-01-28 1:32 ` Rusty Russell
2005-01-28 1:35 ` Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050125220558.6e824f8a.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=bdschuym@pandora.be \
--cc=bridge@osdl.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=gandalf@wlug.westbo.se \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
--cc=snort2004@mail.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).