From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: [PATCH]: was Re: LLTX and netif_stop_queue Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 23:22:27 -0800 Message-ID: <20050126232227.3ce4decb.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20050119144711.3fdd3d93.davem@davemloft.net> <20050119151853.259de49a@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net> <20050119164640.6c67bdfa.davem@davemloft.net> <52r7kgu5n5.fsf@topspin.com> <20050119230526.393a5184.davem@davemloft.net> <20050120085611.33f9485e@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net> <20050121105452.GA12988@xi.wantstofly.org> <20050125222705.1ee878fd.davem@davemloft.net> <20050126132512.GA18220@xi.wantstofly.org> <20050126223247.3e4643cc.davem@davemloft.net> <20050127071645.GA2731@wotan.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: buytenh@wantstofly.org, shemminger@osdl.org, roland@topspin.com, hadi@cyberus.ca, iod00d@hp.com, eric.lemoine@gmail.com, netdev@oss.sgi.com, ak@suse.de, openib-general@openib.org, kaber@trash.net Return-path: To: Andi Kleen In-Reply-To: <20050127071645.GA2731@wotan.suse.de> Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 08:16:45 +0100 Andi Kleen wrote: > > Yes, that's the idea. > > per CPU only works in preemptive kernel if you have preemption > disabled all the time. Do you? > > Seems not likely to me. BH is disabled in these code paths (specifically we're talking about ->hard_start_xmit()), as that is where the recursion check goes. Otherwise, loopback's LLTX is broken as it relies on this property as well.