From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Isaacson Subject: Re: netdev-2.6 queue updated Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 18:15:30 -0800 Message-ID: <20050128021530.GB19150@hexapodia.org> References: <41F980A0.8020905@pobox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Netdev , Linux Kernel , Andrew Morton , Jouni Malinen Return-path: To: Jeff Garzik Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41F980A0.8020905@pobox.com> Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 07:00:32PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > The attached changelog describes what I just pushed out to BitKeeper > (and what should be appearing in the next -mm release from Andrew). > > Note to BK users: please re-clone netdev-2.6, don't just 'bk pull'. It's much more efficient to do % bk undo -a`bk repogca` (which deletes everything in the local repo that's not in the parent) rather than pulling the entire repo over the wire again. [1] You can check what would be deleted by this command with "bk changes -L" similar to how you can "bk changes -R" to figure out what would be pulled. [1] Well, actually, it isn't *quite* that simple; in certain cases, repogca will delete more than it needs to. But it's still more efficient than a re-pull. -andy