From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [PATCH] OpenBSD Networking-related randomization port Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 13:34:08 -0800 Message-ID: <20050128133408.49021343@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net> References: <1106932637.3778.92.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050128100229.5c0e4ea1@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net> <1106937110.3864.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050128105217.1dc5ef42@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net> <1106944492.3864.30.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050128124517.36aa5e05.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Lorenzo =?ISO-8859-1?B?SGVybuFuZGV6IEdhcmPtYS1IaWVycm8=?= , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chrisw@osdl.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com, arjan@infradead.org, hlein@progressive-comp.com Return-path: To: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20050128124517.36aa5e05.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 12:45:17 -0800 "David S. Miller" wrote: > On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 21:34:52 +0100 > Lorenzo Hern=E1ndez Garc=EDa-Hierro wrote: >=20 > > Attached the new patch following Arjan's recommendations. >=20 > No SMP protection on the SBOX, better look into that. > The locking you'll likely need to add will make this > routine serialize many networking operations which is > one thing we've been trying to avoid. >=20 per-cpu would be the way to go here. --=20 Stephen Hemminger