From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: [PATCH] OpenBSD Networking-related randomization port Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 13:45:19 -0800 Message-ID: <20050128134519.11a0e55d.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1106932637.3778.92.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050128100229.5c0e4ea1@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net> <1106937110.3864.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050128105217.1dc5ef42@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net> <1106944492.3864.30.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050128124517.36aa5e05.davem@davemloft.net> <20050128133408.49021343@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: lorenzo@gnu.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chrisw@osdl.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com, arjan@infradead.org, hlein@progressive-comp.com Return-path: To: Stephen Hemminger In-Reply-To: <20050128133408.49021343@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net> Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 13:34:08 -0800 Stephen Hemminger wrote: > per-cpu would be the way to go here. Does the sbox get somehow seeded from use to use? If not, then yes that's the thing to do.