From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Hasso Tepper <hasso@estpak.ee>
Subject: Re: dummy as IMQ replacement
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 14:38:01 +0200
Message-ID: <200501311438.01118.hasso@estpak.ee>
References: <1107123123.8021.80.camel@jzny.localdomain> <200501311020.08337.hasso@estpak.ee> <1107174338.8021.123.camel@jzny.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com, Nguyen Dinh Nam <nguyendinhnam@gmail.com>,
        Remus <rmocius@auste.elnet.lt>, Andre Tomt <andre@tomt.net>,
        syrius.ml@no-log.org, Andy Furniss <andy.furniss@dsl.pipex.com>,
        Damion de Soto <damion@snapgear.com>
Return-path: <netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com>
To: hadi@cyberus.ca
In-Reply-To: <1107174338.8021.123.camel@jzny.localdomain>
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

jamal wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 03:20, Hasso Tepper wrote:
> > Policing didn't work with IPv6 last time I checked.
>
> Really? I take it this is using the u32 classifier?
> What filter did you use?

http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2004q2/012422.html

Got one answer to this in private that "AFAIK it isn't implemented yet".

-- 
Hasso Tepper
Elion Enterprises Ltd.
WAN administrator