From: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com>
To: Bukie Mabayoje <bukiemab@gte.net>
Cc: sfeldma@pobox.com, "David Härdeman" <david@2gen.com>,
"Michael Gernoth" <simigern@stud.uni-erlangen.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: 2.4.29, e100 and a WOL packet causes keventd going mad
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 13:24:31 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050131152431.GA14176@logos.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41FDB2D3.5CBD6F7D@gte.net>
On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 08:23:47PM -0800, Bukie Mabayoje wrote:
>
> Scott Feldman wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2005-01-30 at 09:18, David Härdeman wrote:
> > > I experience the same problems as reported by Michael Gernoth when
> > > sending a WOL-packet to computer with a e100 NIC which is already
> > > powered on.
> >
> > I didn't look at the 2.4 case, but for 2.6, it seems e100 was enabling
> > PME wakeup during probe. PME shouldn't be enabled while the system is
> > up. I suspect the assertion of PME while the system is up is what's
> > causing problems. This patch moves PME wakeup enabling to either
> > suspend or shutdown.
> >
> > David, would you give this patch a try? Make sure the system still
> > wakes from a magic packet if suspended or shut down, and doesn't cause
> > kacpid to go crazy if system is running. If it helps for 2.6, perhaps
> > someone can look into 2.4 to see if there is something similar going on
>
> This issue was reported on 2.4.
Can any of you guys test v2.6, please?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-31 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-30 17:18 2.4.29, e100 and a WOL packet causes keventd going mad David Härdeman
2005-01-31 3:47 ` Scott Feldman
2005-01-31 3:58 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-01-31 5:00 ` Scott Feldman
2005-01-31 6:14 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-01-31 9:08 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-01-31 4:23 ` Bukie Mabayoje
2005-01-31 15:24 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2005-01-31 20:29 ` David Härdeman
2005-01-31 21:13 ` Bukie Mabayoje
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-01-31 19:26 Brandeburg, Jesse
2005-01-31 20:57 ` Bukie Mabayoje
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050131152431.GA14176@logos.cnet \
--to=marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com \
--cc=bukiemab@gte.net \
--cc=david@2gen.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=sfeldma@pobox.com \
--cc=simigern@stud.uni-erlangen.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).