netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David Härdeman" <david@2gen.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com>
Cc: Bukie Mabayoje <bukiemab@gte.net>,
	sfeldma@pobox.com,
	Michael Gernoth <simigern@stud.uni-erlangen.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: 2.4.29, e100 and a WOL packet causes keventd going mad
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 21:29:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050131202940.GA26992@hardeman.nu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050131152431.GA14176@logos.cnet>

On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 01:24:31PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 08:23:47PM -0800, Bukie Mabayoje wrote:
>> Scott Feldman wrote:
>>> David, would you give this patch a try?  Make sure the system still
>>> wakes from a magic packet if suspended or shut down, and doesn't cause
>>> kacpid to go crazy if system is running.  If it helps for 2.6, perhaps
>>> someone can look into 2.4 to see if there is something similar going on
>> 
>> This issue was reported on 2.4.
>
>Can any of you guys test v2.6, please?
>

I tried the second patch provided by Scott on a 2.6.10 kernel, I did 
some minor tweaks to get it to apply (changed pci_choose_state() and 
PCI_D0 back to the way they were in 2.6.10) and tested the results five 
minutes ago.

It works great, I havent tried suspending the machine cause I have no 
need for that functionality. I have however started the machine via WOL 
(works), sent WOL-packet to the machine when powered on (nothing 
happends - kacpid doesn't go wild, works), shutdown (works without the 
machine spontaneously rebooting). 

So everything seems to be fixed by the patch (save for suspending which 
I didn't test).

Thanks alot, I hope the patch will be in the next stable 2.6 kernel.

Regards,
David

  reply	other threads:[~2005-01-31 20:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-01-30 17:18 2.4.29, e100 and a WOL packet causes keventd going mad David Härdeman
2005-01-31  3:47 ` Scott Feldman
2005-01-31  3:58   ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-01-31  5:00     ` Scott Feldman
2005-01-31  6:14       ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-01-31  9:08         ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-01-31  4:23   ` Bukie Mabayoje
2005-01-31 15:24     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-01-31 20:29       ` David Härdeman [this message]
2005-01-31 21:13       ` Bukie Mabayoje
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-01-31 19:26 Brandeburg, Jesse
2005-01-31 20:57 ` Bukie Mabayoje

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050131202940.GA26992@hardeman.nu \
    --to=david@2gen.com \
    --cc=bukiemab@gte.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=sfeldma@pobox.com \
    --cc=simigern@stud.uni-erlangen.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).