From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Francois Romieu Subject: Re: where is the proper place for r8169 bug reports? Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 23:23:42 +0100 Message-ID: <20050131222342.GB13217@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> References: <20050131181508.GA15908@gerbil.toadis.porkis> <20050131214951.GA13217@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <20050131215948.GA23289@gerbil.toadis.porkis> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com Return-path: To: "Dale E. Martin" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050131215948.GA23289@gerbil.toadis.porkis> Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Dale E. Martin : [...] > Hmmm, OK. I'm running Debian stable so that is what cc defaults to. I'll > recompile with 3.3 and see if the problems go away. It could easily > explain the difference between machines too. Typical symptoms: the card works fine until 64 (256) packets are sent (received) then "Good bye Charlie". If it works, I'll gladly welcome an 'lspci -vx' + complete dmesg for my collection. Btw, you can test the patch below (on top of 2.4.28, no bad report so far): http://www.fr.zoreil.com/~romieu/misc/20041209-2.4.28-r8169.c-test.patch -- Ueimor