From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olaf Hering Subject: Re: [PATCH] e1000, errata 2{3, 4} - possible EEH or memory corruption when DMA crosses a 64k boundary Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 20:40:10 +0100 Message-ID: <20050201194010.GA7892@suse.de> References: <468F3FDA28AA87429AD807992E22D07E041A065B@orsmsx408> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com, "Ronciak, John" , "Brandeburg, Jesse" , linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org To: "Venkatesan, Ganesh" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <468F3FDA28AA87429AD807992E22D07E041A065B@orsmsx408> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linuxppc64-dev-bounces@ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc64-dev-bounces@ozlabs.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 01, Venkatesan, Ganesh wrote: > In any case, this fix is required in e1000. It is *not* in the latest > driver that is released but *is* in the driver that is lined up for > release in a couple of weeks. Thats good enough, just that things dont get lost. There are probably a few separate patches for each problem found. We are still in the process of sorting out our +2k patch mess.