netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
To: Dan Siemon <dan@coverfire.com>
Cc: hadi@cyberus.ca, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] batched tc to improve change throughput
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:27:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050214142710.GI31837@postel.suug.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1108340618.14978.66.camel@ganymede>

> >  - The whole interface must take care of the byte order issues. This is
> >    the most tricky part.
> 
> I don't see how byte order issues are a problem when using SOAP.
> Example?

It depends on wehther your outline every qdisc/filter in the protocol.
If you do so it's not a problem but you have to extend your protocol
every time a new qdisc is introduced or an existing one changes. A
generic partly binary based protocol will have byte order issues.

My current idea, given I can't find an existing protocol, is to let
every netlink user describe its own format with a generic grammar so
the protocol can stay stable. One of the candidates is the netconf
specification which basically does what we need but is still in early
development.

> I'm curious exactly what your needs are.

Basically I need to be able to change the beavhiour of the message
parser to for example overwrite the sequence number checking in order
to do message multiplexing. It's not like I would be represenative
though.

> It does appear you are aiming for a somewhat more low level library than
> I am.  Whether or not that precludes some kind of merger I don't know.

Yes, it seems so. It's a pitty that we waste effort by doing the same
nearly work but I really need the low level API and the possibility to
customize the parsing and sending code.

  reply	other threads:[~2005-02-14 14:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-01-17 15:23 [RFC] batched tc to improve change throughput Thomas Graf
2005-01-17 15:45 ` jamal
2005-01-17 16:05   ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-17 16:36     ` jamal
2005-01-17 16:56       ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-17 22:49         ` jamal
2005-01-18 13:44           ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-18 14:29             ` jamal
2005-01-18 14:36               ` Lennert Buytenhek
2005-01-18 14:43                 ` jamal
2005-01-18 15:07                   ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-18 15:20                   ` Lennert Buytenhek
2005-01-19 14:24                     ` jamal
2005-01-18 14:58               ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-18 15:23                 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2005-01-19 14:13                 ` jamal
2005-01-19 14:36                   ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-19 16:45                   ` Werner Almesberger
2005-01-19 16:54                   ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-20 14:42                     ` jamal
2005-01-20 15:35                       ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-20 17:06                         ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-01-20 17:19                           ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-24 14:13                         ` jamal
2005-01-24 15:06                           ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-26 13:48                             ` jamal
2005-01-26 14:35                               ` Thomas Graf
2005-02-11 15:07                               ` Dan Siemon
2005-02-12 13:45                                 ` jamal
2005-02-12 14:29                                   ` Thomas Graf
2005-02-12 22:07                                   ` Dan Siemon
2005-02-12 22:32                                     ` Thomas Graf
2005-02-14  0:23                                       ` Dan Siemon
2005-02-14 14:27                                         ` Thomas Graf [this message]
2005-02-15 20:28                                           ` Dan Siemon
2005-02-15 20:47                                             ` Thomas Graf
2005-02-22 21:40                                               ` Dan Siemon
2005-02-22 23:15                                                 ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-18 15:07               ` Werner Almesberger
2005-01-19 14:08                 ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-19 16:33                   ` Werner Almesberger
2005-01-19 17:22                     ` Thomas Graf
2005-01-17 18:00 ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-01-17 18:02 ` Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050214142710.GI31837@postel.suug.ch \
    --to=tgraf@suug.ch \
    --cc=dan@coverfire.com \
    --cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).