From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Francois Romieu Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] r8169: code clean-up Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 09:16:19 +0100 Message-ID: <20050221081619.GA18754@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> References: <200502161823.43562.jdmason@us.ibm.com> <200502201204.23468.jdmason@us.ibm.com> <20050220233405.GA14268@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <200502202254.23511.jdmason@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com To: Jon Mason Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200502202254.23511.jdmason@us.ibm.com> Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Jon Mason : [...] > My main problem with the above patch is that is assumes that there will > be a maximum of 2 descriptors per jumbo frame (which isn't the case). Where do you see such an assumption ? -- Ueimor