From: Quantum Scientific <Info@quantum-sci.com>
To: netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6 IPV6 Busted
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 14:10:39 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200502271410.39611.Info@quantum-sci.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42222670.3090002@pobox.com>
Are you not understanding that I need to receive packets back? I am not going
to open incoming firewall ports to do this. If you have a way to receive
IPV6 response packets back without opening up your firewall, please enlighten
us.
This is a problem everyone else has too, if they are using the standard kernel
2.6 IPV6 stack.
I am skeptical about this assertion that the whole internet needs to be hashed
if connection tracking. This does not seem to be true on its face. Only
those nodes which are in active virtual circuits would need to be hashed.
This is well within most machines' capability. So barring some inherent IPV6
way of doing this, connection tracking is on.
Carl Cook
On Sunday 27 February 2005 13:58, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Quantum Scientific wrote:
> > On Sunday 27 February 2005 12:59, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >
> >>Connection tracking doesn't scale. It's impossible to hash the entire
> >>Internet.
> >
> >
> > I have read this.
> >
> > And I've seen inferences that IPV6 takes care of this problem somehow
> > automatically. But no one seems to know how.
>
> The solution is to not use connection tracking.
>
> You don't want to break the end-to-end connection model that founded the
> Internet.
>
> Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-27 20:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-27 15:28 Kernel 2.6 IPV6 Busted Quantum Scientific
2005-02-27 16:10 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2005-02-27 16:29 ` Quantum Scientific
2005-02-27 17:28 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2005-02-27 18:08 ` Quantum Scientific
2005-03-15 5:00 ` Horms
2005-02-27 17:40 ` Andre Tomt
2005-02-27 18:20 ` Quantum Scientific
2005-02-27 18:59 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-02-27 19:10 ` Quantum Scientific
2005-02-27 19:58 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-02-27 20:10 ` Quantum Scientific [this message]
2005-02-27 21:35 ` David S. Miller
2005-03-01 10:07 ` Denis Vlasenko
2005-03-01 13:50 ` Quantum Scientific
2005-03-01 16:26 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-01 20:46 ` Tomasz Torcz
2005-03-01 23:55 ` Quantum Scientific
2005-03-02 14:02 ` Denis Vlasenko
2005-03-02 19:12 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-01 21:50 ` Andre Tomt
2005-03-01 23:59 ` Quantum Scientific
2005-02-27 18:12 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200502271410.39611.Info@quantum-sci.com \
--to=info@quantum-sci.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).