From: Quantum Scientific <Info@quantum-sci.com>
To: netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6 IPV6 Busted
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 07:50:00 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200503010750.00630.Info@quantum-sci.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200503011207.34029.vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>
On Tuesday 01 March 2005 4:07, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> I don't think future Internet will be safe enough to open
> corporate networks. I definitely won't do it.
> NAT firewall in front of my net is an absolute requirement
> for me.
I agree that security is an absolute must. It's irresponsible to contend
otherwise.
But black-box NAT is just *simulating* what a well-made ip6tables firewall
does much better. There's no reason every node can't be secure, except the
expertise of the script designer. This is why I wish Shorewall would support
IPV6.
Carl Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-01 13:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-27 15:28 Kernel 2.6 IPV6 Busted Quantum Scientific
2005-02-27 16:10 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2005-02-27 16:29 ` Quantum Scientific
2005-02-27 17:28 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2005-02-27 18:08 ` Quantum Scientific
2005-03-15 5:00 ` Horms
2005-02-27 17:40 ` Andre Tomt
2005-02-27 18:20 ` Quantum Scientific
2005-02-27 18:59 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-02-27 19:10 ` Quantum Scientific
2005-02-27 19:58 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-02-27 20:10 ` Quantum Scientific
2005-02-27 21:35 ` David S. Miller
2005-03-01 10:07 ` Denis Vlasenko
2005-03-01 13:50 ` Quantum Scientific [this message]
2005-03-01 16:26 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-01 20:46 ` Tomasz Torcz
2005-03-01 23:55 ` Quantum Scientific
2005-03-02 14:02 ` Denis Vlasenko
2005-03-02 19:12 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-01 21:50 ` Andre Tomt
2005-03-01 23:59 ` Quantum Scientific
2005-02-27 18:12 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200503010750.00630.Info@quantum-sci.com \
--to=info@quantum-sci.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).