From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olaf Kirch Subject: Re: (usagi-users 03222) Re: support of IPv6 by NFS Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 17:19:05 +0100 Message-ID: <20050301161905.GD22324@suse.de> References: <42243F8D.5030302@bull.net> <200503010744.38339.Info@Quantum-Sci.com> <1109689712.17484.6.camel@firenze.zurich.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: usagi-users@linux-ipv6.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com To: Jeroen Massar Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1109689712.17484.6.camel@firenze.zurich.ibm.com> Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 04:08:32PM +0100, Jeroen Massar wrote: > > There is no Linux 6to4 > >UDP tunnelling app, but there should be, because this is such a common > >problem. (As I understand, Teredo is Winduhs-only, and is not supported by > >most tunnel operators) > > The protocol for Teredo is open and can be implemented at will: Except that it's quite horrible, and it requires a centralized broker, and IIRC it also makes assumptions about the way your NAT implementation assigns ports. Olaf -- Olaf Kirch | --- o --- Nous sommes du soleil we love when we play okir@suse.de | / | \ sol.dhoop.naytheet.ah kin.ir.samse.qurax